What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 10, 2012 (13:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe for my taste a hair too light but the background and the subject are well taken considering the optics used. I think with a macro in your hands you can tell your great. HELLO Forse per mio gusto un pelo di luce di troppo ma lo sfondo e il soggetto sono ben ripresi considerando anche l'ottica usata. Penso che con un macro tra le mani potrai dire la tua alla grande. CIAO |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (14:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
quoto max and you congratulations hello flavio quoto max e ti faccio i miei complimenti ciao flavio |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (14:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you guys! in reality, the objective is the Tamron 70/300 old, but that does not have the macro '1:1. and it is a crap goal ... I put this in the description but I was wrong :-) :-D Grazie ragazzi! in realtà l'obiettivo è il tamron 70/300 vecchio, quello macro che non ha pero' rapporto 1:1. ed è una cacca di obiettivo... ho messo questo nella descrizione ma ho sbagliato :-) |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (17:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Are in agreement with what was written by Max Look at the lens loses some of which you speak 'to 300mm, but the rest is not propio what you call crap, or does his dirty work under the usual money. Sono in accordo con quanto scritto da Max. Guarda che l'ottica di cui parli perde un po' a 300mm, ma per il resto non è propio quello che tu chiami cacca, ossia fa il suo sporco lavoro in base alla solita qualità prezzo. |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (19:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
function works well, in fact I'm doing photos but maybe you get confused with the new one .... aasicuro you that what I have is nothing short of obscene, AF record of slowness and noise, zoom ring that goes horribly shoty ... sure I paid 150 euro ok ... but it takes courage to use it! to pull out the few decent macro you see in this gallery I have thrown at least 60 ... ;-) Wow! beh funzionare funziona, infatti ci faccio le foto ma forse tu ti confondi con quello nuovo.... ti aasicuro che quello che ho io è a dir poco indecente, AF con record di lentezza e rumorosità, ghiera dello zoom che va tremendamente a scatti... certo l'ho pagato 150 euro ok... ma ci vuole coraggio a usarlo! per tirare fuori le poche macro che vedi in galleria DECENTI ne ho buttate almeno 60...  |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (20:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ but maybe you get confused with the new one „ Propio again I would not say. The year of which I speak should be around 2005/2006. It 'was one zoom with whom I had good pictures ... combined with a glorious Minolta. " ma forse tu ti confondi con quello nuovo" Propio nuovo non direi. L'anno di cui parlo dovrebbe essere intorno al 2005/2006. E' stato uno zoom con cui ho fatto buone foto...abbinato ad una gloriosa Minolta. |
| sent on September 10, 2012 (22:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hmmm I do not know if it's mine, maybe you had a piece especially lucky :-) mmmh non lo so se è il mio, magari hai avuto un pezzo particolarmente fortunato |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |