JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Doppia Esposizione: cielo 55s f4.5 iso 1600, cappella 30s f4.5 iso 400 lightpainting
What do you think about this photo?
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 19, 2012 (23:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Francis, I do not know much about this photographic genre, but it seems to me that considering the equipment used did a great job! Congratulations! I also own the 8-16 and I was wondering if it was worth the full groped to use it for the stars and after seeing this photo of yours I would say that I can safely try. Out of curiosity, have you lit the Chapel? Ciao Francesco, non mi intendo molto di questo genere fotografico ma mi sembra che considerando l'attrezzatura utilizzata hai fatto un ottimo lavoro! Complimenti! Anche io possiedo l'8-16 e mi chiedevo se ne valeva la piena tentare di usarlo per le stelle e dopo aver visto questa tua foto direi che posso tranquillamente provare. Per curiosità, hai illuminato tu la Cappella?
sent on August 20, 2012 (0:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
with the passage well, whereas it is a 8-16 f4 and that only goes to 1600 millina think I can feel quite satisfied with what I came up with (though honestly I was hoping for a little bit more ...) you with the d90 should be able to pull much of the iso and in my opinion this kind of photos do not be afraid to exaggerate the feeling ;-)
you have enlightened me a chapel with a torch led exposition that I did for the first floor.
ps: do not ask whether it is worth using the 8-16, try to use it and try to get us out the most, then see if it is a genre that you like you can ask yourself if it's worth buying a dedicated goal. (This was the pearl of wisdom to 0:00:-D) grazie del passaggio bhe si considerando che l'8-16 è un f4 e che la millina arriva solo a 1600 credo di potermi ritenere abbastanza soddisfatto di quello che ho tirato fuori (anche se sinceramente speravo in qualcosina di più...) tu con la d90 dovresti riuscire a tirare ben più su gli iso e a mio parere in questo genere di foto non bisogna aver paura di esagerare con la sensibilità
si ho illuminato io la cappella con una torcia a led nell'esposizione che ho fatto per il primo piano.
ps: non chiederti se vale la pena di usare l'8-16, prova ad usarlo e cerca di tirarci fuori il massimo, poi se vedi che è un genere che ti piace puoi chiederti se vale la pena di comprare un obiettivo dedicato. (questa era la perla di saggezza delle 0:00)