What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 19, 2016 (17:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well, personally I find the questionable construction.
I only see blurry and indistinguishable masses, unable to "conjure up" anything.
Probably the photographer has in mind some idea (or sensation, feeling, emotion, etc.), Who knows, maybe even interesting, but it is certainly not able to translate it into photography and then to communicate it to the observer.
W. Beh, personalmente trovo la realizzazione discutibile.
Io vedo solo masse sfocate e non distinguibili, incapaci di "evocare" alcunché.
Probabilmente il fotografo ha in testa qualche idea (o sensazione, sentimento, emozione, ecc.), chissà, magari anche interessante, ma non è certo riuscito a tradurla in fotografia e quindi a comunicarla a chi osserva.
W. |
| sent on December 19, 2016 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Witty,
First of all thanks for the ride. I really like your criticism because it allows me to explain:
The masses blurry and indistinguishable took and searched or are opposed to deliberately focus the head portion; the picture must be read from right to left and try to projector the observer in an evocative dimension. The photo is made up of only two elements, and the intention was to describe a moment of introspection. I would not in any way you enhance a picture that perhaps has little but I try to show that was not made without any idea.
Thank you anyway
Luciano Ciao Witty,
Innanzi tutto grazie per il passaggio. Mi piace molto la tua critica perché mi permette di spiegare:
Le masse sfocate e non distinguibili sono volute e cercate e si contrappongono alla porzione di testa volutamente a fuoco; la foto va letta da destra verso sinistra e tenta di proiettore l'osservatore in una dimensione evocativa. La foto è composta da solo due elementi e l'intenzione era quella di descrivere un momento di introspezione. Non mi permetto minimamente si esaltare una foto che forse ha ben poco ma cerco di dimostrare che non è stata scattata senza nessuna idea.
Ti ringrazio comunque
Luciano |
| sent on December 19, 2016 (22:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me the idea was good, if the subject had been more rotated toward the lens. We would read better glasses, so that they understand little. Per me l'idea era buona, se il soggetto fosse stato più ruotato verso l'obiettivo. Avremmo letto meglio gli occhiali, che così si capiscono poco. |
| sent on December 19, 2016 (22:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like even though I did not understand a tube
mha Mi piace anche se non ci ho capito un tubo
Mha |
| sent on December 19, 2016 (22:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In the blur can be seen as a face, it looks like a skull. Interesting. Bello also the title Nello sfocato si intravede come un viso, sembra un teschio. Interessante. Bello pure il titolo |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (11:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
MattewX, in what way "we also read glasses" ??? Are you kidding me? (I do not offend anyway)
Hello MattewX, in che senso"avremmo letto anche gli occhiali"??? Mi prendi in giro?(non mi offendo comunque)
Ciao |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (11:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
NacaPatanta, Thomas One,
Thanks anyway for your time.
A sincere greeting.
Luciano NacaPatanta, Thomas One,
Grazie comunque per il tempo dedicatomi.
Un saluto sincero.
Luciano |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (12:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Read = reading of the photos. So you do not understand checsono glasses Letto=lettura della foto. Così non si capisce checsono occhiali |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (12:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
with every effort I just can not figure out what it is, I would say that the intention was good but the implementation is not well managed con tutti gli sforzi possibili non riesco proprio a capire di che si tratti, direi che l'intenzione era buona ma la realizzazione non è riuscita bene |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (12:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But you're talking about glasses? :-or Ma di che occhiali state parlando? |
| sent on December 20, 2016 (13:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well ... the little that stands out is: a wool hat, hair and an angle of a pair of glasses (worn on the forehead?).
But the very fact that you are here to discuss what to see and not see, rather than what the picture says or does not say in my testimony of the few successful shooting.
W. Beh... il poco che si distingue è: un cappello di lana, dei capelli ed un angolo di un paio di occhiali (portati sulla fronte?).
Ma il fatto stesso che si stia qui a discutere di cosa si veda e non si veda anziché di cosa la foto dica o non dica secondo me testimonia della poca riuscita dello scatto.
W. |
| sent on December 21, 2016 (10:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok guys, thank you anyway the time dedicated,
But I really can not understand ...,
Talk about a picture in terms of what to see or do not see leaves me a bit 'confused ...,
But that's okay though. ???
Greetings Ok ragazzi, vi ringrazio comunque del tempo dedicatomi,
Ma non riesco davvero a capire...,
Parlare di una foto nei termini di cosa si veda o non si veda mi lascia un po' perplesso...,
Ma va bene comunque.???
Saluti |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
