What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 19, 2012 (16:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
First post, after several tests this seemed "worthy" to be published in order to have your comments and criticism, thanks. Primo post, dopo svariate prove questa mi sembrava "degna" di essere pubblicata per avere i vostri commenti e critiche, grazie. |
| sent on August 19, 2012 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Undoubtedly, the wings are well taken, but frankly that's not enough, it must also appear clear head. Probably with better parallelism'd have the trump card. Indubbiamente le ali sono ben riprese, ma francamente questo non basta, occorre che anche le testa compaia nitida. Probabilmente con un miglior parallelismo avresti avuto la carta vincente. |
user1338 | sent on August 19, 2012 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The colors seem a little saturated, beautiful copy for the rest Pigi said it well.
Hello. ;-) I colori sembrano un filo saturi, bello l'esemplare per il resto Pigi ha detto bene.
Ciao. |
user14758 | sent on August 19, 2012 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Superb! I am no expert but the macro depth of field is scary .. is very low! Stupenda! non sono un esperto del macro ma la profondità di campo fa paura.. è ridottissima ! |
| sent on August 20, 2012 (9:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to Pigi47, Dipi09 and Nik90 comments. In fact, I focused too much in seeking clarity on the wings but I lost sight of the whole ......
Thanks for the ride and suggestions.
Grazie a Pigi47, Dipi09 e Nik90 dei commenti. In effetti mi sono concentrato troppo nel cercare la nitidezza sulle ali ma ho perso di vista l'insieme......
Grazie del passaggio e dei suggerimenti.
|
user14758 | sent on August 20, 2012 (10:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Forgive my ignorance on the field .. but usually the macro with that aperture should be made? perdonate la mia ignoranza sul campo.. ma di solito i macro con che diaframma andrebbero fatti? |
| sent on August 20, 2012 (12:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Forgive my ignorance on the field .. but usually the macro with that aperture should be made? „
As you can see I have even novice but, following the forum for some time, I noticed that the normally spectacular photos that post their masters (I say this with sincere respect) in this forum are made using diaphragms between 9 and 13 .... . unfortunately not always the conditions of light or wind permit ...... " perdonate la mia ignoranza sul campo.. ma di solito i macro con che diaframma andrebbero fatti?"
Come vedi sono anche io alle prime armi ma, seguendo il forum da qualche tempo, ho notato che normalmente le foto spettacolari che postano i maestri (lo dico con sincero rispetto) in questo forum sono fatte usando diaframmi tra 9 e 13..... purtroppo non sempre le condizioni di luce o di vento lo permettono...... |
user14758 | sent on August 20, 2012 (12:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
and already .. here helps x FF sensor noise handling at high ISO ... because I do notand chee macro to 2.8 is useless. is capable of one eye is in focus and the other does not ... the depth of field is too small .. But right af 13 must have a good light to use a shutter speed fast enough to avoid micro moved quite complicated .. oO ... it also takes luck .. a lot .. no wind ... e già.. quì ti aiuta il sensore FF x la gestione del rumore ad alti iso... poichè sto notand chee fare macro a 2.8 non serve a niente. è capace che un occhio è a fuoco e un altro no... la profondità di campo è troppo ridotta.. però giustamente a f 13 devi avere una buona luce per usare un tempo di scatto abbastanza rapido da evitare il micro mosso..abbastanza complicato o.O.... ci vuole anche fortuna.. molta.. niente vento... |
| sent on August 20, 2012 (12:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I stand corrected, the focal rise far beyond it to f 20.
The results can be seen in photos taken with the values ??of the exposure are great but need the boundary conditions, we hope to find them soon! ;-) mi correggo, le focali salgono anche molto oltre fino a f 20.
I risultati che si vedono in foto scattate con quei valori di diaframma sono fantastici ma servono le condizioni a contorno, speriamo di trovarle presto!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
