What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 15, 2016 (21:59) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on December 15, 2016 (22:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
from memory one of the best shots in this species posted on my forum: -o: -o a memoria uno dei migliori scatti a questa specie mia postati sul forum  |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (1:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The catch is significant, I am not convinced the development: it seems a bit 'over-exposed and the green of the disturbing background. In my humble opinion, you can easily turn it into a big shot. Hello La cattura è notevole, non mi convince lo sviluppo: mi pare un po' sovraesposta e il verde dello sfondo disturba. Secondo la mia modesta opinione, puoi facilmente trasformarla in un grande scatto. Ciao |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (5:49) | This comment has been translated
Really nice catch, congrats |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (7:40) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you guys!! @Cadl Have certainly right, this is a jpeg old growth that I did last year and then left aside. I went to fish it out without putting his hand because I could not work and I wanted to upload something different. Returning to view the original raw files, I immediately noticed that the PP got too is the temperature of the white, both saturation. As show I think is right, in the sense that sottoesponendola the subject would become too dark, something that was not in place (I mean the brownish color of the plumage). I remember that the slightly backlit background gave little more than a nuisance to be white stones that reflected a little. Thank you all! ;-) Grazie ragazzi!! @Cadl hai sicuramente ragione, questo jpeg è un vecchio sviluppo che avevo fatto lo scorso anno e poi lasciato da parte. Sono andato a ripescarlo senza metterci mano perchè non riuscivo a lavorarci e volevo caricare qualcosa di diverso. Tornando a vedere il file Raw originale, ho notato subito che nella pp alzai troppo sia la temperatura del bianco, sia la saturazione. Come esposizione credo sia giusta, nel senso che sottoesponendola il soggetto diventerebbe troppo scuro, cosa che non era sul posto (mi riferisco al colore marroncino del piumaggio). Mi ricordo che lo sfondo leggermente retroilluminato dava un pò fastidio oltre ad esserci pietre bianche che riflettevano un pò. Grazie a tutti! |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (10:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Magnificent portrait subject very well, with great sharpness and beautiful pose, compliments Magnifico soggetto ritratto molto bene, con grande nitidezza e bella posa, complimenti |
| sent on December 16, 2016 (11:32) | This comment has been translated
Really nice catch! |
| sent on December 18, 2016 (10:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Marco and Luigi! Next time place the same photo with a new pp, this was obviously wasted. as I have pointed out, the subject deserves better! Hello!! :-P Grazie Marco e Luigi! prossima volta posto la stessa foto con una nuova pp, questa era evidentemente sciupata. come mi hanno fatto notare, il soggetto merita di meglio! Ciao!! |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |