What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on December 18, 2016 (16:01) | This comment has been translated
Marvelous, congrats |
| sent on December 18, 2016 (23:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Onorato Francesco! Onorato Francesco! |
| sent on December 25, 2016 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Francesco, usually prefer the f in "s" and the central point then recomposing, I tried a bit 'all, and this pleases me most ;-) Ciao Francesco, solitamente prediligo l'af in "s" e il punto centrale per poi ricomporre, le ho provate un po' tutte e questa mi garba di più |
| sent on December 26, 2016 (12:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
just like me so ehehehh !! the only thing I fear is that if the spouses are in motion, and with a very open aperture and shutter delay between maf, can get out out of focus. For example, when the bride enters the church, are you suggesting maf C or 3d? esattamente come me quindi ehehehh !! l'unica cosa che temo è che se gli sposi sono in movimento, a diaframma molto aperti e col ritardo tra maf e scatto, possano uscire fuori fuoco. Per esempio quando la sposa entra in chiesa, tu consigli maf C o 3d ? |
| sent on December 26, 2016 (13:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here is what is a case where raffico in afc Ecco quello è un caso dove raffico in afc |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |