What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 27, 2016 (23:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful open net.
:-) Splendida anche questa. |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (23:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Andrea! Grazie mille Andrea! |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (23:59) | This comment has been translated
Wonderful! |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (0:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Many thanks Gemminio! (I hope I have the name wrong) Grazie infinite Gemminio! ( spero di non aver sbagliato nome) |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (0:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ Thank you very much Gemminio! (I hope I have the name wrong) „ Did you go near :-D Hello,
Gemmino " Grazie infinite Gemminio! ( spero di non aver sbagliato nome) " Ci sei andato vicino Ciao, Gemmino |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (0:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Cabbage apologize Gemmino! : - | Cavolo chiedo scusa Gemmino! |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (6:59) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (7:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ I apologize Cabbage Gemmino! „ But nothing :-D " Cavolo chiedo scusa Gemmino!" Ma di niente |
| sent on November 28, 2016 (10:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Absolutely Henry, it seems to go to great .. but I only tried it for a couple of hours .. so I hope to get to know him better and to improve.
This file still try to postprodurlo again because this time I messed around a bit with DXO beginning and then I switched to Photoshop. DXO does a great job on noise reduction, but I forgot to reset the various nitidezze and then the detail was already coarse when I switched to Photoshop .. I try again calmly. ;-) Assolutamente Enrico, mi sembra vada alla grande.. ma l'ho provato solo per un paio d'ore.. spero quindi di imparare a conoscerlo meglio e di migliorare ulteriormente. Questo file comunque proverò a postprodurlo di nuovo perchè questa volta ho pasticciato un po con DXO all'inizio e poi sono passato a Photoshop. DXO fa un lavoro egregio sulla riduzione rumore, ma mi sono dimenticato di azzerare le varie nitidezze e il dettaglio quindi era già grossolano quando sono passato a Photoshop.. Riproverò con calma. |
| sent on December 01, 2016 (21:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Alan, congratulations, a classic really well done! The quality is seen! You have done well to take the 300 than the 100-400, the results are of a different level. Alan, complimenti, un classico davvero ben eseguito! La qualità si vede! Hai fatto bene a prendere il 300 rispetto al 100-400, i risultati sono di un altro livello. |
| sent on December 01, 2016 (22:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the nice comment Lorenzo. As mentioned caption this is one of the very first shots, I have yet to get the hang .. especially with file PP. The 300 I exclusively favorite for the opening at f4, a factor that saves me on the iso. On pure optical quality between the two I was not informed that great, but I suspect that the 300 f4 is higher. Grazie del bel commento Lorenzo. Come detto in didascalia questo è uno dei primissimi scatti, devo ancora prenderci la mano.. soprattutto con la PP dei file. Il 300 l'ho preferito solo ed esclusivamente per l'apertura a f4, fattore che mi fa risparmiare sugli iso. Sulla pura qualità ottica tra i due non mi ero informato un granché, ma sospetto che il 300 f4 sia superiore. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |