What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 27, 2016 (21:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Since you have the edge you could to right the picture and then see if there are slight falling lines. The good point shooting and composition, some burned area but perhaps not recoverable. In urban shots maybe a 16-35mm tokina f.2,8 is more functional, a 16-85mm Nikon or at least a Tamron 24-70mm f.2,8 (imho). Hello, laurel Visto che hai margini si potrebbe radrizzare l'inquadratura e poi vedere se sono presenti delle leggere linee cadenti. Buoni il punto di ripresa e la composizione , qualche zona bruciata ma forse non è recuperabile. Nelle riprese urbane forse è più funzionale un 16-35mm tokina f.2,8 , un 16-85mm nikon o al limite un 24-70mm tamron f.2,8 (imho). Ciao, lauro |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much for tips since I'm going from Canon to Nikon and I have to redo the "park" optics. Today was the output rhyme with the "new" purchase and I realized that I still have to learn a lot with the new "commands". The first thing I have to do is to sell my beautiful "bianchino" Canon f4 L USM is :-( and take a corresponding, though f 2.8; I thought Sigma or Tamron. What do you think? + Which one do you recommend? Grazie mille per gli utili consigli dato che sto passando da Canon a Nikon e devo rifare il "parco" ottiche. Oggi è stata la prima uscita con il "nuovo" acquisto e mi sono accorto che devo ancora imparare molto con i nuovi "comandi". La prima cosa che devo fare è di vendere il mio bellissimo "bianchino" Canon f4 L is USM e prendere un corrispondente, però f 2,8; pensavo Sigma o Tamron. Che ne pensi? + Quale mi consiglieresti? |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (21:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You should blindly the tamron vc f.2,8 usd used obelisk and 5 years warranty + Tamron 24-70mm f.2,8 vc usd compared to 35-70mm that allows you to start with 24mm and may make differences in these urban circumstances. (imho). Hello, laurel Ti consiglio ad occhi chiusi il tamron vc usd f.2,8 usato lisco e con 5 anni di garanzia + tamron 24-70mm f.2,8 vc usd che rispetto al 35-70mm ti permette di partire da 24mm e potrebbero fare la differenza in queste circostanze urbane.(imho). Ciao, lauro |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (21:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Lauro, I will keep this your advice. Until next time. Hello, Henry. Grazie Lauro, terrò presente i tuoi consigli. Alla prossima. Ciao, Enrico. |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (22:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Henry, already the quality of the files is on another level ... Then follow the instructions on the Lauro PP are correct for me, trying to straighten a bit ';-) Good start ... and now super telephoto March F1 test in Barcelona ;-) Hello Fabio Ciao Enrico, già la qualità dei file è su un altro livello... Poi i consigli sulla PP di Lauro sono corretti per me, cerca di raddrizzarla un po' Buon inizio...ora supertele e a Marzo test F1 a Barcellona Ciao Fabio |
| sent on November 27, 2016 (23:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Haha, maybe. Thanks Fabio. Hello Ahah, magari. Grazie Fabio. Ciao |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |