What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 21, 2016 (12:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Super!! bye, see you soon ;-) :-) Super!! ciao a presto  |
| sent on November 21, 2016 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the eye is perfect seems to touch it, but the legs puzzle me, so little depth even at f / 10 or PP effect l'occhio è perfetto sembra di toccarlo, ma le zampette mi lasciano perplesso, cosi poca profondità anche a f/10 o effetto della PP |
| sent on November 21, 2016 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
always very incisive files. Notable plumage
hello soon 8-) File sempre molto incisivo. NOtevole il piumaggio
ciao a presto |
| sent on November 21, 2016 (12:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful, I agree with Oliver 3b, congratulations 8-)
Claudio C Molto bella , condivido Oliver 3b, complimenti
Claudio C |
| sent on November 21, 2016 (12:50) | This comment has been translated
Beautiful! |
| sent on November 21, 2016 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks to all of the passage :-)
Your concerns are probably due to lack of knowledge of the factors being: the beccamoschino was precisely 3.70 m, the minimum distance of 500 maf f 4 is II (before skulk my partner Paul's focused on my hand to be accurate to mm), these distances to have everything in focus you have to be at least 11 or af hope for a flat and parallel to the sensor installation.
I chose f 10 for the bottom a little intrusive, in this way the 'I better fuzzy and became decent.
In post sfoco no nothing, only I use my flow to pull out much detail as possible and a phase of denoise to eliminate noise.
A salutone ;-) Grazie a tutti del passaggio
Le vostre perplessità probabilmente sono dovute alla mancata conoscenza dei fattori in corso: il beccamoschino era precisamente a 3.70 m, la minima distanza di maf del 500 f 4 is II ( prima di appostarci il mio socio Paolo ha focheggiato sulla mia mano per essere precisi al mm ), a queste distanze per averlo tutto a fuoco devi stare almeno a f 11 o sperare in una posa piatta e parallela al sensore.
Io ho scelto f 10 per il fondo un pò invadente, in questa maniera l' ho sfocato meglio ed è diventato decente.
In post non sfoco nulla, uso solo il mio flusso per tirare fuori più dettagli possibili e una fase di denoise per eliminare il rumore.
Un salutone |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
6.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
