What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 14, 2016 (16:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
interesting! ... at least someone will be able to take off from the head all the crap that they tell us on television on super moon ...: - /
great photos! ;-) interessante!...almeno qualcuno riuscirà a togliersi dalla testa tutte le cretinate che ci raccontano in televisione sulla super Luna...
ottime foto!  |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (17:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto As written by David Barillaro.
Both shots are well executed and show a remarkable detail Quoto quanto scritto da Davide Barillaro.
Entrambi gli scatti sono ben eseguiti e mostrano un dettaglio notevole |
user28347 | sent on November 14, 2016 (17:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
it is seen that it is larger on the right, however, seems to me sharper left si vede che è più grande a destra ,però mi par più nitida a sinistra |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (18:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the sharpness in the picture of this kind is influenced by dozens of factors, the most important of which is the atmospheric turbulence ... and in f / 1.2 portrait is completely irrelevant but in that kind of shooting and focal ones is all
As for the "bigger" ... yes it is ... like in any peak, that is when you switch from a distance of 360 thousand km and about 400 thousand ... is the question of the super moon to be a mink ... by feisbuccari ... although people will be convinced to have seen even bigger to the naked eye and bright la nitidezza in foto di questo genere è influenzata da decine di fattori, il più importante dei quali è la turbolenza atmosferica...che nei ritratti a f/1.2 è del tutto ininfluente ma in quel genere di riprese e a quelle focali è tutto
quanto al "più grande"...sì, lo è...come in ogni apogeo, cioè quando passi da una distanza di circa 360mila km e circa 400mila...è la questione della super Luna ad essere una mink... da feisbuccari...nonostante la gente si sia convinta di averla vista anche ad occhio nudo più grande e luminosa |
user28347 | sent on November 14, 2016 (18:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
;-) ;-) I had done that 10 years ago the superluna but there was little difference avevo fatto quella di 10 anni fa di superluna ma c'era poca differenza |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (18:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful composition, in addition to the different apparent diameter is known well the lunar libration. Bella composizione, oltre al differente diametro apparente si nota bene la librazione lunare. |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (8:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very good document! Compliments!
Sergio ;-) :-P Ottimo documento! Complimenti!
Sergio |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (8:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Excellent documentary, congratulations! :-)
Good day!
Raffaele :-P Ottimo documentario, complimenti! 
Buona giornata!
Raffaele |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (8:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
compliments, a good idea and a great implementation ;-) complimenti, una buona idea ed un'ottima realizzazione |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (8:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I doubt that with a 300 you can have this size (crop) of the moon ... I multiplied with a 400 I can barely make it the goal of these ... dubito che con un 300 si possano avere queste dimensioni (crop) di luna... io con un 400 moltiplicato riesco a malapena farla la meta di queste... |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (14:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Compliments,
just a clarification, dated 20/07 not think it was the apogee. However remarkable shot.
Also I have made a match, just to highlight the exaggeration of the media in these astronomical events Complimenti,
solo una precisazione, in data 20/07 non mi pare fosse all'apogeo. Comunque notevole scatto.
Anche io ho fatto un raffronto, giusto per mettere in evidenza l'esagerazione dei media in questi eventi astronomici |
| sent on November 15, 2016 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful very interesting idea, thank you. Una bellissima idea molto interessante, grazie. |
user59947 | sent on November 15, 2016 (21:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful photos and nice comparison bellissima foto e bel confronto |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
