JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on August 09, 2012 (23:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition and colors. Blurry, check if the shooting data are accurate because they seem really incredible: 100 iso - F.18 and 1/640 sec. wow! A sigma 70-300mm can not do miracles if close to F.18: fconfuso: The image does not fall in the category "Pets", the move in Fauna ". ;-) ... even if the man has made more confident by not respecting his wildness 8-) hello and good life, laurel Buoni la composizione e i colori. Poco nitida, verifica se i dati di scatto sono esatti perchè sembrano proprio incredibili: 100 iso - f.18 e 1/640 sec. Un sigma a 70-300mm non può fare i miracoli se chiudi a f.18 L'immagine non rientra nella categoria "Animali domestici", la sposto in Fauna", . ... anche se l'uomo l'ha resa più confidente non rispettando la sua selvaticità ciao e buona vita, lauro
sent on August 11, 2012 (20:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand that you have in your hands a canon 5d mark II and other cameras where you can dare to stop, but the shooting situation seems quiet: fconfuso:. If riducevi the iso and you opened the diaphragm could be improved and how much ... (IMHO) Keep in mind that very few optical F.18 hold up a closing. Your perspective is not part of this lot and the consequence is the emergence of diffraction with the consequent drastic loss of sharpness. If reviewing the best photos you will notice that it lacks micro-contrast, the diaphragm was wiser for your sigma F.8-f9 ;-). hello and good light, laurel
Comprendo che hai tra le mani una canon 5d mark II e puoi osare dove altre reflex si fermano, ma la situazione di ripresa mi sembra tranquilla. Se riducevi gli iso e aprivi il diaframma potevi migliorarla e di molto...(IMHO) Tieni presente che pochissime ottiche reggono un f.18 di chiusura . la tua ottica non rientra in questo lotto e la conseguenza è l'emergere della diffrazione con la conseguente perdita drastica di nitidezza. Se riesamini meglio la foto noterai che manca di microcontrasto , il diaframma più saggio era per il tuo sigma f.8-f9 . ciao e buona luce, lauro
sent on August 12, 2012 (11:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello addition to being a novel of the forum, I am also a newbie with photography and I'll thank you for your criticism to good use. good light. ciao oltre che essere un novello dei forum,sono anche un novellino con la fotografia e grazie della critica ne faro buon uso .buona luce.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
Un sigma a 70-300mm non può fare i miracoli se chiudi a f.18 
