What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 243000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 02, 2012 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello my daughter Aurora said your photo and 'beautiful, I also have the Canon 28-300, how do you think?
and 'a lens much discussed either love it or hate it.
Hello David Ciao mia figlia Aurora ha detto che la tua foto e' bellissima, ho anch'io il 28-300 Canon, tu come ti trovi?
e' una lente molto discussa o la odi o la ami.
Ciao Davide |
| sent on October 02, 2012 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A beautiful fireworks! ;-) Un bel fuoco d'artificio!  |
| sent on October 02, 2012 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
by David the 28-300 I do not like as much as quality. I had got it because I thought it was perfect for walking around with a goal only. Now, when you do not know what I will photograph, I prefer to take two or three goals to the good ones (usually the 300/2.8, the 24-70 and the 16-35. per Davide: il 28-300 non mi piace tanto come qualità. L'avevo preso perché credevo che fosse l'ideale per andare in giro con un obbiettivo solo. Ora invece, quando non so cosa fotograferò, preferisco portare due o tre obbiettivi di quelli belli (di solito il 300/2.8, il 24-70 e il 16-35. |
| sent on March 13, 2013 (13:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
“ when you do not know what I will photograph, I prefer to take two or three goals to the good ones (usually the 300/2.8, the 24-70 and the 16-35. „ Swan light ...:-P
Your experience with "your trees" is very interesting and cheerful! " quando non so cosa fotograferò, preferisco portare due o tre obbiettivi di quelli belli (di solito il 300/2.8, il 24-70 e il 16-35." Gironzoli leggero...
Il tuo sperimentare coi "tuoi alberi" è molto interessante ed allegro! |
| sent on March 13, 2013 (16:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
for Mario. Yes, there are photos that I like very much, although when I posted I was told were in the Photo Art instead of Flora. I do not think so, because there is no processing but just a little 'saturation. However, this particular photo is too saturated.
For the equipment: I have repeatedly tried to lighten the backpack for ski racing, but I realized that I can not do without a body with the 300, a body with the 24-70, the monopod, the two duplicators , hiking boots, ski boots, crampons ... Tomorrow there is a FIS giant in La Thuile. Tonight weight of the backpack. per Mario. Sì. Sono foto che mi piacciono molto, anche se quando le ho postate mi hanno detto che andavano nella sezione Photo Art anziché in Flora. Io penso di no, perché non c'è elaborazione ma solo un po' di saturazione. Comunque questa foto in particolare è troppo satura.
Per l'attrezzatura: ho più volte provato a alleggerire lo zaino per le gare di sci, ma mi sono accorto che non posso fare a meno di un corpo con il 300, un corpo con il 24-70, il monopiede, i due duplicatori, gli scarponi da montagna, gli scarponi da sci, i ramponi ... Domani c'è un gigante FIS a La Thuile. Stasera peso lo zaino. |
| sent on March 14, 2013 (0:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Backpack> 20 kg. Zaino > 20 kg. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
11.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
