What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 10, 2016 (21:51) | This comment has been translated
Nice photo! |
| sent on November 10, 2016 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
: -o A nice bag !!!!
Hello  un sacco bello!!!!
ciao |
| sent on November 11, 2016 (7:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good buy, you'll see immediately the quality of the 100-400,
already this picture you can see the difference, excellent quality ottimo acquisto, ti accorgerai da subito della qualità del 100-400,
già da questa foto si vede la differenza, qualità eccellente |
| sent on November 11, 2016 (9:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Mark, thanks Jordan River by Nike, in this picture I could not come up with the ultimate in not the 'I worked with Ltr6 because the version I have does not handle RAW of the G7. Using Silkipix provided by Panasonic you are lost in sharpness. However, some features of this' optical it has already appeared obvious. The blur is significantly better than the 100-300 blurry and contrary to what I thought, even if the brightness is 400 mm lower than the 100-300, the focus is faster, surely due to the motor used. Even with the Oly M5 II the focus speed is faster and absolutely silent while with the Oly 100-300 produces an audible noise and that disturbs slightly in the video. Proving that a 'more advanced electronics also exceeds the limits of brightnessto. Hello and Happy Photos. Grazie Marco, grazie Giordano, grazie Nike, in questa foto non ho potuto tirar fuori il massimo in quanto non l' ho elaborata con Ltr6 perchè la versione che ho non gestisce i RAW della G7. Usando Silkipix fornito da Panasonic si perde in nitidezza. In ogni caso alcune caratteristiche di quest' ottica mi sono già apparse evidenti. Lo sfocato è nettamente migliore dello sfocato del 100-300 e contrariamente a quanto pensavo, anche se la luminosità a 400 mm è inferiore al 100-300, la messa a fuoco è più veloce, sicuramente dovuta al tipo di motore utilizzato. Anche con la Oly M5 II la velocità di messa a fuoco è più rapida e assolutamente silenziosa, mentre con la Oly il 100-300 produce un rumore udibile e che disturba leggermente nei video. A dimostrazione che un' elettronica più evoluta supera anche i limiti della luminosità. Ciao e Buone Foto. |
| sent on November 11, 2016 (12:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
beautiful shot, excellent sharpness. bellissimo scatto,ottima nitidezza. |
| sent on November 11, 2016 (17:36) | This comment has been translated
Excellent! |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (10:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fausto nice shot!
I expect you can work the files in Lightroom in order to have your opinion more specific.
As for the AF could you already tell us something? Do you think it is also exploited the AF-C for this kind of photos? Bello scatto Fausto!
Aspetto che tu possa lavorare i file in lightroom per poter avere un tuo parere più specifico.
Per quanto riguarda l'AF sapresti già dirci qualcosa? Secondo te è sfruttabile anche l'AF-C per questo genere di foto? |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Alan, with the G7 I tried to use af tracking with hens d 'water that move continuously on' water and almost all of the photos are perfectly focused. I tried to full extension, 400 mm and with the aperture wide open, and in acceptable lighting conditions. Check with moving subjects in a more unpredictable, maybe when bicker. In any case it is evident that the engine of 100-400 is more rapid and efficient than the 100-300 and also with the OLY M5 II does not produce any noise, while with 100-300 feels distinctly when focussing and generates a background noise in the video. But to have a more comprehensive opinion I have to try again in many other situations, hello soon. Ciao Alan, con la G7 ho provato ad usare il tracking af con gallinelle d' acqua che si muovono di continuo sull ' acqua e quasi tutte le foto sono perfettamente a fuoco. Ho provato alla massima estensione , 400 mm e col diaframma tutto aperto e in condizioni di luce accettabili. Da verificare con soggetti che si muovono in maniera più imprevedibile , magari quando bisticciano. Ma per avere un parere più completo devo provarlo ancora in tante altre situazioni, ciao a presto. |
| sent on November 14, 2016 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Fausto Hello, thanks for the information! I do not is to just wait a few more your opinion in a few output ..
Thanks so much.
Alan Ciao Fausto, grazie per le informazioni! Non mi rimane altro che aspettare qualche altro tuo parere fra qualche uscita..
Grazie mille.
Alan |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
