RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio Naturale
  4. » The unchallenged power of water

 
The unchallenged power of water...

Escursioni

View gallery (8 photos)

The unchallenged power of water sent on November 06, 2016 (22:20) by Ipatton. 15 comments, 545 views. [retina]

at 17mm, 0.8 sec f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod. Parco del Corno alle Scale, Italy.

Prima cascata del Dardagna - Corno alle Scale #water #waterfalls #cascate #longexposure #natura



View High Resolution 20.0 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 202000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2016 (17:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Marco, the lovely view ... maybe a little 'over-exposed and washed out ... I would try to lower the overall exposure by 1 stop and give a little' more than saturation, I am sure that the colors were ;-)

Stephen

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2016 (17:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I see blue, sooo.
if I were you scalderei least the WB to see if it improves, but then I would act selectively on the blue channel for desaturarlo.
Also I would give an eye to the slope of the picture, in my way to the left just look at the line of pool just below the waterfall.
But if it was all done on purpose then do not take account of my comment.
Hello
Simone

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2016 (17:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Stefano excuse but to me it seems too saturated. apart from the blue, look under the leaves and green.
I think the trees are bare and colors I doubt that there were still, I agree however on the top too light.

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2016 (18:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Meanwhile, thank you both pass, absolutely very welcome!
To tell the truth once loaded on the site to me the colors have not met much, the computer give me another sensation.
I agree with the Commissioner on the WB, will try to retouch it a bit ', and the fact that it hangs slightly (strange, they are usually very picky about this).
The colors of the leaves in the foreground were very bright.
The upper part is actually a bit 'too light, but I'm a goat in post and for now this is the maximum recovery that I managed to get ...: - |
Thanks again to both.
Marco

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2016 (21:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I tried to straighten it and to review the WB and actually at first I had not realized how blue proves ... thank you Commissioner for the valuable advice ;-)
I'd say that's better! To the top of the time I do not know what to do ...: - /




avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2016 (21:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

To tell the truth once loaded on the site to me the colors have not met much, the computer gives me a different feeling.

Check that the .jpg you upload on the site has sRGB color profile, otherwise you will lose the color fidelity.
I agree that the top is definitely over-exposed, even pity for the decline of sharpness on the right rock.

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2016 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Nicola of passage; the decline of sharpness on the right boulder there is little to do, there is the fault of 17-40, especially at 17 ...

avatarsenior
sent on November 07, 2016 (21:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Marco excuse if I would, but for me is still very blu.poi if you like the cool shade then it is fine.
I tried to fix it, I send the dropbox link to get the psd that if you open with photoshop you can see the various levels of fatti.bilanciamento color adjustment of tones and shadows means curves to darken around the waterfall, saturation of yellow and red to give some colore.vedi you if you can come in handy at least for the color of the rocks and the shadows that for me to be almost neutre.il sky from jpeg is irretrievable.
Hello
www.dropbox.com/s/60fgcfg6exjljat/28102016_Dardagna_34-Modifica-2.psd?

avatarjunior
sent on November 07, 2016 (22:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Meanwhile, thanks to the Commissioner patience (as well as for signing went to see more photos of my gallery ;-)).
I will definitely be working on; between I realized that you have similar shots with a high part much less overexposed.
Post production fascinates me a lot but unfortunately I have very little time to applicarmici.
At first glance, the version you passed me is a bit 'too green, if not in absolute terms at least as I remember the scene in the reality that I had before my eyes while I took.
Certainly very interesting work on the curves, midtones, and shadows: I will try to understand something more.
Thank you so much for the constructive help!
Hello
Marco

avatarjunior
sent on November 08, 2016 (18:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Simon, I have not yet had time to try to figure out what you did, but I'd like to know what you think of this version (the picture is only slightly different and departure picture was very underexposed).
Definitely it is improved but it seems better and more faithful to the real scene.
Thank you




avatarsenior
sent on November 08, 2016 (21:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)


avatarjunior
sent on November 08, 2016 (22:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks again Simone.
The Raw last photo posted, according to Lightroom, has a temperature of 8000 and +15 hue.
Taking the eyedropper and clicking on the boulder in the foreground center, next to the one with the leaves the temperature goes to 12000 with +16 hue and the result is this, in fact in my opinion very enjoyable:





Thanks again for your patience and the desire to help me to understand the mistakes.
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on November 08, 2016 (22:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

here is this is the most correct result have seen so far.
12,000 but are you sure? :-or
it seems to me an exaggeration!
I do not know how it behaves the wb when shooting under certain lighting conditions, I never do in case much to the numbers, but maybe it also depends on how you recorded the raw? you shots with automatic wb? are questions because I'm not a technical person, I sometimes say stupid things, but it seems strange 12000 wb when the regular scene usually is around 6000 / 6500gradi kelvin., but if lightroom thus saith will surely correct.
Hello

avatarjunior
sent on November 08, 2016 (23:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Simone fact, to me it seemed strange because usually my pictures oscillate between 5500 and 6500 degrees, so much so that 8000 already seemed a lot and 12000 I got there just doing the test with the dropper that you suggested you otherwise I never thought of avvicinarmici.
But just seen the result to 12,000 I knew I had made the center, so that covering a posteriori the photo published first appears to me now impossible ...: - /
You usually click through WB automatically; from mega ignorant question: - | But the fact that it has taken a decidedly underexposed photos to get a correct exposure of the upper sky affected the WB?
You were really valuable with your comments Simone, I am truly grateful.
Marco

avatarsenior
sent on November 08, 2016 (23:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)



Advertisement

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me