What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on November 06, 2016 (14:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Persist. you have room to improve. Hello
PersistI. hai margini per migliorare. ciao
|
| sent on November 06, 2016 (18:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello, thank you for the encouragement Mauro.
How can I improve?
Marco Ciao, ti ringrazio per il incoraggiamento Mauro.
Come posso migliorare?
Marco |
| sent on November 07, 2016 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
for this kind of photos (birds), they will serve much more powerful telephoto lenses; are, however, expensive glasses, so better you are quite sure that this photographic genre interests you. per questo genere di foto (avifauna), credo ti servano teleobiettivi ben più potenti; sono comunque vetri costosi , quindi meglio tu sia ben sicuro che questo genere fotografico ti interessa. |
| sent on November 10, 2016 (17:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you ... I provsto with 18-140, and if I made these photos with the 70-300, which changes?
Thank you all.
Marco Ti ringrazio... avevo provsto con il 18-140, e se facessi queste foto con il 70-300, che cambia?
Grazie a tutti.
Marco |
| sent on November 10, 2016 (18:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Definitely changes the zoom ratio, you have to see if it is sufficient for the photos you want to do; my strictly personal opinion, however, a good 70-300 is always a worthwhile goal in your kit. Sicuramente cambia il rapporto d'ingrandimento, bisogna vedere se è sufficiente per la foto che vuoi fare; opinione mia strettamente personale, comunque, un buon 70-300 è sempre un obiettivo utile nel proprio corredo. |
| sent on November 10, 2016 (19:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I will follow 'your advice. Seguiro' il tuo consiglio . |
| sent on April 02, 2018 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello everyone, sorry if there is too much grain and you can not see well, but what is it?
Thanks to those who answer.
Marco Ciao a tutti, scusate se c'è troppa grana e non si vede bene, ma che voltaile è?
Grazie a chi risponde.
Marco |
| sent on April 02, 2018 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Given the white on the side, it could be a moorhen.
Beyond the focal too short to make birdlife, in this case the focus is wrong (the first grass on the left is in focus).
Hello
Ilario Visto il bianco sul fianco, potrebbe essere una Gallinella d'acqua.
Aldilà della focale troppo corta per fare avifauna, in questa comunque la messa a fuoco è sbagliata (è a fuoco l'erba in primopiano a sx).
Ciao
Ilario |
| sent on October 13, 2019 (6:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Ilario, thanks for your comment.
Good photo!
Mark
Ciao Ilario, grazie del tuo commento.
Buone foto!
Marco |
| sent on June 10, 2020 (20:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gianna. Grazie Gianna. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
