What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 22, 2016 (19:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
forgive me, Pugli, why use the diaphragm fully open producing nearly anything with little depth of field on fire? You had the opportunity to close the diaphragm using a more time a bit 'slower than however would guarantee you a steady shot with 50 mm. A greeting perdonami, Pugli, perchè usare il diaframma totalmente aperto ottenendo una quasi nulla profondità di campo con poco a fuoco? Avevi la possibilità di chiudere maggiormente il diaframma utilizzando un tempo un po' più lento che comunque ti avrebbe garantito uno scatto fermo con il 50 mm. Un saluto |
| sent on October 22, 2016 (20:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile, thanks for coming by Claudio ;-)
The picture I liked more open Aperture because it was the most impressive, I had also made a much more depth of field but appeared trivial and gave me the idea to be too full of details, and in the end I chose this one. I unconvincing having to scroll down the page to see it all. Greetings Intanto grazie per essere passato Claudio
L'immagine mi è piaciuta più aperta di diaframma perché era più suggestiva, ne avevo fatta una anche con molta più profondità di campo ma risultava banale e mi dava l'idea di essere troppo carica di dettagli, e alla fine ho scelto questa. Non mi convince dovendo scorrere la pagina per vederla tutta. Saluti |
| sent on October 22, 2016 (20:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
of course everyone has his reasons and to you like apertures. But I see, for example, that even the photo with the grating in the foreground and the little window at the top with the cornice are focusing only on the upper parts: the entire grille is completely out of focus and do not understand the meaning ovviamente ognuno ha le sue ragioni e a te piacciono i diaframmi aperti. Ma vedo, per esempio, che anche la foto con la grata in primo piano e la finestrina in alto con il cornicione sono a fuoco solo le parti in alto: l'intera grata è completamente fuori fuoco e non ne capisco il senso |
| sent on October 23, 2016 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
focus or not Tattari Beccia always has its charm ;-) a fuoco o no Tattari beccia ha sempre il suo fascino |
| sent on October 27, 2016 (11:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Claudio "of course everyone has his reasons," I agree! Everyone sees in his own way the photograph, the important thing is to like someone.
John are Tattarese of adoption but I immediately fell in love with this city ;-) Claudio "ovviamente ognuno ha le sue ragioni" concordo! Ognuno vede a modo suo la fotografia, l'importante è che piaccia a qualcuno.
Giovanni sono Tattarese di adozione ma mi sono subito innamorato di questa città |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
