What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user92328 | sent on October 21, 2016 (16:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Woww f / 3.5 is truly remarkable yield, better than f / 22 and very similar to f / 11 ... Interesting .. !!! Woww a f/3.5 è davvero notevole la resa, meglio di f/22 e molto simile a f/11... Interessante..!!! |
| sent on October 21, 2016 (18:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Salvo.
As this 20mm f / 3.5 Ai has considerable curvature of field I used the hyperfocal taking as reference the cleats on the barrel (something that rarely find on contemporary goals). To have clarity over the whole surface would prefer to use the Samyang 12 / 2.0. On the other hand the images of this venerable Nikon they like the terms of color and chiaroscuro, typically "vintage".
This aspect it also underlines Marco Cavina in the article on p. 9:
www.marcocavina.com/articoli_fotografici/articolo-Nikkor-20mm-prototip
"... However, the color reproduction and contrast is magnificent."
Cavina used it between 1981 (coincidentally, the year when I bought mine) and 2000, then pellicola. But it seems to me to make color and contrast very well even with the Sony sensors.
Hello Grazie Salvo.
Siccome questo 20mm f/3.5 Ai presenta una notevole curvatura di campo ho usato l'iperfocale prendendo come riferimento le tacchette sul barilotto (cosa che trovi raramente sugli obiettivi contemporanei). Per avere nitidezza su tutta la superficie preferirei usare il Samyang 12/2.0. In compenso le immagini di questo vetusto Nikon mi piacciono dal punto di vista cromatico e chiaroscurale, tipicamente "vintage".
Questo aspetto lo sottolinea anche anche Marco Cavina in questo articolo a p. 9:
www.marcocavina.com/articoli_fotografici/articolo-Nikkor-20mm-prototip
"... tuttavia la riproduzione del colore e dei contrasti è magnifica."
Cavina l'ha usato tra il 1981 (guarda caso, l'anno in cui ho comprato il mio) e il 2000, quindi su pellicola. Ma mi sembra che per colore e contrasto renda molto bene anche con i sensori Sony.
Ciao |
user92328 | sent on November 09, 2016 (15:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree, in lovely colors, but also the clarity / purity that returns is very beautiful ...
But I do not know if you experience the typical characteristics of the vintage, to me conveys a lot of naturalness, that is the beauty as it is, and is not a trivial matter .... !!
Hello Si sono d'accordo, gran bei colori, ma anche la chiarezza/limpidezza che restituisce è molto bella...
Ma non so se manifesta delle caratteristiche tipiche del vintage, a me trasmette un sacco di naturalezza, cioè la bellezza cosi com'è, e non è cosa da poco....!!
Ciao |
| sent on November 09, 2016 (16:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The colors and the chiaroscuro of vintage like me too, maybe he plays the master factor, since I have used them for decades.
Hello I colori e la resa chiaroscurale dei vintage piacciono anche a me, forse ci gioca il fattore anagrafico, visto che li ho usati per decenni.
Ciao |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
