RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio Naturale
  4. » Stream Fosso della Mola

 
Stream Fosso della Mola...

Paesaggio Natura Montagna 2

View gallery (9 photos)

Stream Fosso della Mola sent on October 11, 2016 (15:41) by Pier88. 38 comments, 740 views.

at 18mm, 1.6 sec f/13.0, ISO 100, tripod. Cascate di Castel Giuliano, Italy.

Torrente Fosso della Mola, stesso torrente che va a formare le cascate di Castel Giuliano. #natura #cascate



View High Resolution 2.4 MP  



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 202000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (15:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo does not convince me at all ..
The PDR looks too tight, there is no "air: or playing the stream or nothing.
Moreover the post is for me to review.
I would have left more room for the tree to contextualize everything!

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (15:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the color saturation. I held the rock in the middle, to show the entire curve of the creek on the right. Perhaps even departing a hair you could give a little air to the scene, especially as the background is very pleasing.
I also like the contrast between the water softness and the angularity of the rock, although in shadow parts are a bit 'too dark, but maybe you can fix with a minimum of PP.
Compliments.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (16:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

At first glance I like liked this more pdr ... then forced to look at them I do not know more :-D
I like the reflections of light in the rock and blur to me seems perfect view of the speed of the current ..
There jars the fence, even if there is little I eye fell I would try to clone it ... mainly because it is a natural environment, and even though the man now has invaded the world looking at the pictures I like to dream of a world still wild ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like both but I comment that this is the one I prefer, although I like most of the other the woods at the top, which is less confused and harmonizes better with the small waterfall. For the rest, they are shots that I've never done but I've always liked. Wet rocks with autumn leaves are made very well, as the waterfall. I repeat, you lose a bit 'at the top with that piece of wood, too bright, cut trees and all very confusing. Sure, it was there .. you could not remove it, to take up at a different time.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (17:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you all for your comments and suggestions.
Unfortunately it is a part full of Mediterranean forest, in the end everything is always confused, very difficult to make a few shots with the orderly vegetation, the best thing in my opinion in these cases is to remove all or leave very little.

The fence did not I think to take it off, now that you told me that jars bother me too ...

Razor, I took the photo at 8:45, starting at 6 foot and despite all the light at that time was already very strong, I had to reduce almost completely the highlights.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (17:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I was thinking more like an evening / night shoot, perhaps using the light painting ... but if you took almost 3 hours to get not think it's right around the corner, so best avoided ... :-D

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (18:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Ah, you know it's not really a bad idea? The light painting I like, I will think, maybe this winter :-D
In truth, to get it takes an hour and a half, but the other time I lost to photograph here and in the various points of the route. However certainly it must be earned.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (19:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I've never done this type of photos and do not deny that I'd like to rectify such :-D
The only thing out of place in the photo is the upper part where there are trees and fence. For this reason, I cut off the picture and I would try a panoramic format type 2/5 or 1/2.
Hi Davide

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (20:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks for the tips :-) Baribal

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (20:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For what it's worth, given the flatness of my eye, I agree with the 'observation made by Peppe.

The PP, I see pushing the contrast and sharpness, and there is eh, it will also go to tastes, what does not convince me is the composition ... I can not find a spot that catches my eye, I see the falls, well done , then I toss and turn, but I see little else.

A larger composition think would be better, so I think that missing "air."

Of course is just my vision.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (22:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello filter thank you for your considerations. I think like you, the problem is that a larger composition would also thrown into the confusion of the local vegetation. Anyway I will be back, maybe this winter and I'll see if I can pull off something more palatable.

avatarsenior
sent on October 18, 2016 (22:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

For my taste, perhaps a bit 'too much in particular was opposed as regards reflexes. Sin also have cut a part of the stream on the right. Moving the pdr a bit 'to the left, at the same focal perhaps you could frame the entire waterway.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (0:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nicola will turn up to me to have cut that part, in fact the picture is optional, however, the same photo shoot from an angle that takes a bit 'all, try to give him a look.

avatarjunior
sent on October 19, 2016 (9:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I prefer the uniformity of this exposure, there are no areas too light as the other. However, it lacks the right part of the stream, which is present in the other. Maybe, but I do not understand, the water looks like a fog in the lower left but do not know whether it is a virtue or a defect.
Hello

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (10:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The water comes and goes in different directions, it seems to be at a crossroads.
This makes it, in my opinion, the picture of non-read.
Being a small waterfall, I expect the water falling down and amen. Here the movement is along two directives, making the scene a bit 'chaotic.

About the pp, I state that I do not like too much water vapor, in my opinion, you lose the sense of movement.
The exasperated contrast makes everything shiny, between the vitreous and plasticky. You lose in naturalness.
The greens tend to yellowish. I would try a pp less farfetched.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (11:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

But the water with this effect has not even had to post production, it is exclusively due to the long time used. Some do not like, but I've always found a particular effect pleasing to watch.
Thanks for your suggestions.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (11:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Well of course the long time. I misspelled the phrase, I was referring to contrast and sharpening.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (11:48) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

But also in the high-res version you find it so full of sharpening?

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (12:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

It is not a question of resolution, but the feeling of a narrow tonal range. A loss in the middle tones.

avatarsenior
sent on October 19, 2016 (13:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The fact is that the preview of increases Juza me a lot do not know why the picture is sharpening, which if you see in high resolution there is, as the original photos.


Advertisement

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me