What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 08, 2016 (22:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful sin the focus.
Mat Bella peccato lo sfuocato.
Mat |
| sent on November 26, 2016 (21:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is not in focus. Non è a fuoco. |
| sent on November 26, 2016 (22:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I specifically chose the diaphragm 1.4 for the blurring effect. Ho scelto appositamente il diaframma 1.4 per l'effetto sfuocato. |
| sent on February 18, 2017 (17:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The sogegtto is the girl, our eyes looking for a narrow zone of depth of field, an area that should convey our eyes and that usually are the two eyes of the model.
Here the focus is uncertain and the nodal part of the shoot (the eyes or face) of the model are out of focus.
bright perspective but used to ta here in f.1,4 and manual focus, requires a surgical maf.
To compensate for any fluctuations in the body of the model you could stop down slightly (x es.f.3,2-4 a fronatale shooting) mattendo embossed sharp but extolling the blurred area around it.
(Imho)
Hello, laurel Il soggetto è la ragazza, i nostri occhi cercano una zona ristretta di profondità di campo, una zona che dovrebbe veicolare i nostri occhi e che di solito sono i due occhi della modella  .
Qui la messa a fuoco risulta incerta e la parte nodale dello scatto (gli occhi o il viso) della modella sono fuori fuoco.
Un'ottica luminosa ma usata a t.a. , qui a f.1,4 e manual focus, richiede una maf chirurgica.
Per compensare eventuali oscillazioni del corpo della modella si poteva chiudere il diaframma di poco (es.f.3,2-4 x una ripresa frontale) mettendo in rilevo una zona nitida (occhi-bocca-naso) ma esaltando lo sfocato intorno ad essa.
(imho)
Ciao, lauro |
| sent on February 19, 2017 (3:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Specifically sought is my specific choice of focus. This goal I know how to use it and I made photos with greater depth of field. My choice is clear and I am satisfied in softness and sharpness and precision of points to highlight. Appositamente cercata é una mia scelta precisa dello sfuocato. Questo obiettivo sò come si usa e ho fatto foto con maggiore profondità di campo. La mia scelta é precisa e rimango soddisfatto in morbidezza e nitidezza e precisione di punti da mettere in risalto. |
| sent on July 18, 2017 (17:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Augusto,
You say you have specially tried the blur, but the problem is another ... even by shooting af / 1.4 something in focus should have been here, unfortunately in the fire I see nothing: - / ciao Augusto,
tu dici di aver appositamente cercato lo sfuocato, però il problema è un altro... anche scattando a f/1,4 qualcosa a fuoco doveva esserci, qui purtroppo a fuoco non vedo nulla  |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
24.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
