What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on October 01, 2016 (20:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This is much better: the details are more pronounced and the background sky is more black and uniform color, also no longer see the whitish veil that you could see in the first photo. Congratulations great job :-) Questa è molto meglio: i dettagli sono più marcati e il fondo cielo è più nero e di colore uniforme, inoltre non si vede più quel velo biancastro che si vedeva nella prima foto. Complimenti ottimo lavoro |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (20:44) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Gianluca!:) |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (20:45) | This comment has been translated
Extraordinary! |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (21:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
3 hours of installation ??? : -o Excuse the question, but which uses focal ratio? It comes out overexposed ?? Vabbeh resume that narrow band, but three hours are so many eh !! Compliments!!
Marzio 3 ore di posa??? scusa la domanda, ma che rapporto focale usi? Non esce sovraesposta?? Vabbeh che riprendete in banda stretta, ma 3 ore sono tante eh!! Complimenti!! Marzio |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
oops, I corrected .. They are placed from 1 hour to 3 no! oops , ho corretto .. Sono pose da 1 ora non da 3 ! |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (21:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
in any case I do not think would have been over-exposed. The channel in which I took poses 1 is now the 'Ha (Acca Halfa) by a filter that lets through only light in a window of only 3 nm of a particular wavelength. in ogni caso non credo sarebbe risultata sovra esposta . Il canale in cui ho ripreso pose da 1 ora è l' Ha( Acca Halfa) mediante un filtro che lascia passare solo luce in una finestra di appena 3 nm su una particolare lunghezza d'onda. |
| sent on October 01, 2016 (23:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the clarification. 8-) renew the compliments !! Grazie per la delucidazione. rinnovo i complimenti!! |
| sent on October 02, 2016 (0:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
MarsCr Thanks! :) Grazie MarsCr!:) |
| sent on October 02, 2016 (1:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This chromatically is better but the other even though purple blue had a something special, more ethereal and soft focus 3d. Questa cromaticamente è migliore ma l'altra benché viola blu aveva un non so che di particolare, più flou etereo e 3d. |
| sent on October 03, 2016 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, maybe you're right, this for the fact that I had differently dosed the stars of lesser intensity confining more on background sky. In this, however, even the stars of lesser intensity have a presence greater. But otherwise the two images do not compare. In the first there were really a lot of problems.
Sun thanks! :) Si , forse hai ragione , questo per il fatto che avevo dosato in modo differente le stelle di minore intensità confinandole più sul fondo cielo. In questa , invece, anche le stelle di minore intensità hanno una presenza maggiore . Ma per il resto le due immagini non hanno confronto. Nella prima c'erano veramente moltissimi problemi. grazie Sun!:) |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |