What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 23, 2016 (12:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Wow is just the same, though probably not in the same location. And 'evident a different color rendering, but obviously the 2 machines can not be compared on this floor. Congratulations to you Paul ;-) ;-) Wow è proprio la stessa, anche se probabilmente non nella stessa location. E' ben evidente una diversa resa cromatica, ma ovviamente le 2 macchine non possono essere paragonate su questo piano. Complimenti a te Paolo |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Piero,
The location is definitely not the same: that of my picture ... my house! :-D
As regards the chromatic yield, contrary to my habits, my photo is ... b / n!
Thank you very much for the compliments!
Regards, Paul Ciao Piero,
la location non è sicuramente la stessa: quella della mia immagine è... casa mia!
Per quanto riguarda la resa cromatica, contrariamente alle mie abitudini, la mia foto è in... b/n!
Grazie mille per i complimenti!
Saluti, Paolo |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (12:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Ok you can also see from this that I am no expert. Anyway your image and sharper and brighter than mine and I do not depend on a post-production, but by a better performance of the sensor, right?
: - /: - / Ok si vede anche da questo che non sono un esperto. Cmq la tua immagine e più definita e brillante della mia e credo non dipenda da una post-produzione, ma da una migliore resa del sensore, Giusto?
 |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (12:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It is probable!
They say that the D610 sensor should be pretty ... good!
But, these things (I who "come" from analogue), are not as experienced it myself!
Hi Paul E' probabile!
Dicono che il sensore della D610 dovrebbe essere abbastanza... buono!
Ma, di queste cose (io che "provengo" dall'analogico), non sono tanto esperto neanche io!
Ciao, Paolo |
| sent on September 23, 2016 (14:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In tests on dpreview the difference is there, but we also talk about a confrontation between micro 4/3 and full frame. Which I suppose is inevitable the advantage of the last. Hi Paul Nei test su dpreview la differenza c'è, ma parliamo anche di un confronto tra micro 4/3 e full frame. Per cui direi che è inevitabile il vantaggio dell'ultima. Ciao Paolo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
