Lake Fremamorta top

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

3.0 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Prove View gallery (16 photos)

Lake Fremamorta top sent on July 25, 2012 (23:09) by Matteo.Cantoro. 4 comments, 982 views.

at 35mm, 1/640 f/11.0, ISO 200, hand held. Parco Naturale delle Alpi Marittime, Italy.

Riduzione del rumore + smart sharpner con Layer mask

View High Resolution 3.0 MP

3 persons like it: Ciocca Sergio, Matanò Francesco, Zman

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Elleemme

sent on July 25, 2012 (23:33)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

In ognuna trovo un difetto Eeeek!!!

Ma non ti conviene prima applicare la maschera di contrasto (non esageratamente) e poi applicare la riduzione del rumore selettivo?
-nella 2a (Riduzione del rumore + maschera di contrasto)
ad esempio la montagma frotale è pastosa senza dettaglio ma la zona in primopiano all'ombra è gradevole
-nella 3a (Riduzione del rumore + smart sharpner con Layer mask)
la montagna è più dettagliata ma la zona in ombra è quasi inguardabile come nella prima foto (solo mdc)

In each find a defect wow!
But do not you should first apply the unsharp mask (not overly) and then apply selective noise reduction?
-In the second (Noise Reduction + unsharp mask)
eg montagma frotale is pasty without detail but the area in the foreground shade is pleasant
-The third (Noise Reduction + smart sharpner with Layer Mask)
the mountain is more detailed but the shaded area is almost unwatchable as in the first photo (only mdc)

Matteo.Cantoro

sent on July 25, 2012 (23:50)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie Lauro. Prima o poi ce la faccio a postprodurla decorosamente MrGreen

Nella terza ho applicato una leggera riduzione del rumore con Lightroom. Poi ho trasferito il tif su Photoshop Elements e qui duplicando il livello ho applicato lo smart sharpen e con la lager mask ho escluso dallo sharpen il cielo.

Ho duplicato un altro livello ed ho applicato una forte riduzione del rumore e con la lager mask l'ho applicata solo al cielo

La zona in ombra che non ti piace è quella sulle rocce od il riflesso sul lago?

Grazie ancora sto cercando di far tesoro dei tuoi consigli ;-)

Thanks Lauro. Sooner or later, I make it a decent postprodurla:-D

In the third I applied a slight noise reduction in Lightroom. Then I transferred the tif Photoshop Elements here and duplicating the layer I used the smart sharpen and the lager mask I sharpen excluded from the sky.

I duplicated another level and I applied a strong noise reduction and the lager mask I applied only to the sky

The shaded area you do not like is that on the rocks or the reflection on the lake?

Thanks again I am trying to learn from your advice ;-)

Elleemme

sent on July 26, 2012 (0:19)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Intendevo la zona in primo piano a sinistra sullo specchio ghiacciato.
Pertendo dalla tua immagine postata con solo mdc, ho ridotto il rumore solo sul cielo e solo su alcuni tratti non congelati dell'acqua e parte dell'angolo a sinistra ...nulla più .
L'importante è che tu trovi la procedura che più appaghi le tue aspettative ;-)

.. continua così ..

ciao, lauro

I meant the area in the left foreground frozen on the mirror.
Pertendo from your image posted with contrast medium only, I reduced the noise only on the sky, and only on certain sections not frozen water and the angle to the left ... nothing more.
The important thing is that you see the procedure that best satisfies your expectations ;-) .. continues ..

hello, laurel

Matteo.Cantoro

sent on July 26, 2012 (10:53)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Grazie Lauro ;-)

Thanks Lauro ;-)

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.