What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on September 27, 2016 (16:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
good pdr as well as the idea of ??the shot, but the sky and the sea too overexposed (especially the sky) ... :-( Pdr buono come pure l'idea dello scatto, ma cielo e mare troppo sovresposti (soprattutto il cielo)...  |
| sent on May 08, 2017 (19:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Photos a little overexposed ...
It's a shame not to create the cleavage of the scaffolding with respect to the cliff ... If you can calculate the wave motion you can take it without taking a bath ... ;-) Foto un pò sovraesposta...
Un peccato non creare lo stacco del faraglione di sx rispetto alla scogliera...Se calcoli bene il moto ondoso riesci a fotografarlo senza fare il bagno... |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (10:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I think they wanted filters for this shot or at least a circular nd secondo me ci volevano dei filtri nd per questo scatto o almeno un nd 8 circolare |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (12:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Why choose, in all shots, to make water "silky"? Now it is a fashion, it seems that photographing a watercourse or sea to the natural is a mortal sin. In Iceland then the strength of the sea feels overpowering and is one of the characteristics of Icelandic nature, so the waters of the Vik Bay so silky become completely unnatural as it would be unnatural to propose an overview of the Gulf of Naples with Vesuvius and .. ... a boreal aurora. Perchè la scelta, in tutti gli scatti, di rendere l'acqua "setosa"? Ormai è una moda, sembra che fotografare un corso d'acqua od il mare al naturale sia un peccato mortale. In Islanda poi la forza del mare si sente prepotente ed è una delle caratteristiche della natura islandese, per cui le acque della baia di Vik così setose diventano del tutto innaturali, come sarebbe innaturale proporre una panoramica del golfo di Napoli con il Vesuvio ed.....una aurora boreale. |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (12:58) | This comment has been translated
I agree |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (13:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
that cabbage is centered ... but a degrading filter allows you to not lose the sky .. as in this case .., because if it is as you say you .. why did you give 8 seconds ????
it does not make sense .. the rocks at the bottom additionally seem to be devoid of details ...
cmq the world is nice because everyone sees it as you want ;-) che cavolo centra..., ma un filtro degradante ti permette di non perdere il cielo.. come in questo caso.. , perche' se e' come dici tu.. perche' hai dato 8 secondi????
non ha senso.. le rocce in fondo oltretutto sembrano prive di dettagli...
cmq il mondo e' bello perche' ognuno la vede come vuole |
| sent on November 06, 2017 (15:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It belongs to my memories. I agree that there are mistakes. I actually realized that the trend of long times is a bit stubborn. Water is not silky. Water is water.
Today I do not do that again.
Appartiene ai miei ricordi. Concordo che ci siano errori. Effettivamente rilevavo che la tendenza dei lunghi tempi sta un pò stufando. L'acqua non è setosa. L'acqua è acqua.
Oggi non la rifarei così.
|
| sent on March 24, 2019 (20:17)
The Moon with water |
| sent on September 26, 2019 (22:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Vik is really an exceptional place, where the contrasts are so accentuated that the choice of black and white sometimes makes even better. In your case I really like the color you've kept Vik é davvero un posto eccezionale, in cui i contrasti sono così accentuati che la scelta del bianco e nero a volte rende anche meglio. Nel tuo caso mi piace tantissimo il colore che hai mantenuto |
| sent on April 05, 2020 (20:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The location is beautiful, already seen, but beautiful.
It's hard you haven't used filters, the right diaphragm (if you're with the tripod because you shoot with f/ so open?!?) much more closed.
The photo is too overexposed and loses the magic of the place without having almost a gap between the sky and the sea.
Wouldn't it have been better to do it?
Peo!
Heauti.
Claudio La location è bella, già vista, ma bella.
Peccato tu non abbia usato filtri, il giusto diaframma (se sei con il treppiede perchè scattare con f/ così aperto?!?) molto più chiuso.
La foto è troppo sovraesposta e perde della magia del posto senza avere quasi distacco tra cielo e mare.
Un pò di post non sarebbe stata meglio farla?
Peccato!
Saluti.
Claudio |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
7.7 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
