What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 18, 2016 (0:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The LMC in the Shield, congratulations Marzio, is beautiful La Grande Nube nello Scudo, complimenti Marzio, è bellissima |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (9:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
With flare you mean the brightest stars "from balls"? Con flare intendi le stelle più luminose "pallonate"? |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (9:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's right ... Tell me that you know what the problem :-P Si esatto...dimmi che sai qual'è il problema |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (9:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It would take an opinion even Vega .... but it's on vacation? Ci vorrebbe un parere anche di Vega....ma che sia in ferie? |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (15:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I can not tell what is the problem, I'm sorry ... even in some of my photos I noticed the same defect, with a Canon 1100D modified Super UV / IR.
It is accentuated further when use as the focal 180 / 2.8 Nikon AF-D and decreases with 300/4 Af-D..col triplet Tecnosky 480/80 is almost absent. Using a room modified by me without filters in front of the sensor instead seems to have disappeared completely. Non so dirti quale é il problema, mi dispiace...anche in alcune mie foto ho notato lo stesso difetto, con una Canon 1100D modificata Super UV/IR.
Si accentua maggiormente quando uso come focale il 180/2.8 Nikon Af-D e diminuisce con il 300/4 Af-D..col tripletto Tecnosky 480/80 é quasi assente. Utilizzando una camera modificata da me senza filtri davanti al sensore invece sembra sparito completamente.
Discutendo con il personale della Astronomik mi suggerivano una incompatibilitá tra i coating delle lenti e il filtro Super UV/IR, peró anche con una 450D non modificata il problema si presentava comunque. (N.B. Utilizzavo sempre un filtro UHC-E). |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (20:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You said something back to me on so many facts reasonings
"It is more accentuated when use as the focal 180 / 2.8 Nikon AF-D and decreases with 300/4 Af-D..col triplet Tecnosky 480/80 is almost absent. Using a room modified by me without filters in front of the sensor instead it seems to have disappeared completely. "
A skin it would say that the problem is the Baader that the very open focal highlights more.
Patience.
Thank you
Hello :-) Hai detto una cosa che mi torna su tanti ragionamenti fatti
"Si accentua maggiormente quando uso come focale il 180/2.8 Nikon Af-D e diminuisce con il 300/4 Af-D..col tripletto Tecnosky 480/80 é quasi assente. Utilizzando una camera modificata da me senza filtri davanti al sensore invece sembra sparito completamente."
A pelle mi viene da dire che il problema è il filtro Baader che sulle focali molto aperte si evidenzia maggiormente.
Pazienza.
Grazie
Ciao |
| sent on August 18, 2016 (20:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sensational shooting and exciting as usual!
Bravo Marzio, congratulations!
Hello and good evening!
maximum :-) Sensazionale scatto ed emozionante come al solito !
Bravo Marzio, complimenti !
Ciao e buona serata !
Massimo |
| sent on August 19, 2016 (0:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It could be, but also the filter stock canon sembea not be free from defect! When I can I will do other tests.
However it also seems that the focal influences the size of the clear.
Meanwhile, I have to test if the halos appear also with other filters as the CLS CCD and UHC. Potrebbe essere, ma anche il filtro stock canon non sembea essere esente dal difetto! Quando riesco farò altre prove.
Comunque mi sembra anche che la focale influenzi la dimensione dell'alone.
Intanto devo testare se gli aloni compaiono anche con altri filtri come il CLS CCD e l'UHC. |
| sent on August 19, 2016 (8:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Massimo ... as always!
Good weekend :-D
Hello, Marzio Grazie Massimo...come sempre!
Buon fine settimana
Ciao, Marzio |
| sent on August 19, 2016 (8:45) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Jonny |
| sent on August 22, 2016 (15:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Marzio really nice !! compliments!!! Davvero bella Marzio!! complimenti!!! |
| sent on August 22, 2016 (15:46) | This comment has been translated
Thanks davvero |
| sent on August 24, 2016 (10:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I love your Marzio wide fields !! :-D Adoro i tuoi campi larghi Marzio!! |
| sent on August 24, 2016 (12:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It makes me a great pleasure !! :-D Mi fa un gran piacere!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
2.5 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
