What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on August 16, 2016 (11:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good composition and point of recovery. I am not convinced the blue sky and the dominant green water. The sensor calls for a cleaning. F.20? and diffraction? (Imho) Hello, laurel Buoni la composizione e il punto di ripresa. Non mi convincono l'azzurro del cielo e le dominanti verdi nell'acqua. Il sensore chiede una pulizia. F.20? e la diffrazione? (imho) Ciao, lauro |
| sent on August 16, 2016 (12:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Lauro hello, I'm glad to hear from, the dominant greens are probably due to my mistake using the picture of the capture control software NXD (color fluorescence-controlled). As for the sensor cleaning and 'gia' it was made. Do you think f20 are too many ?? enough f16? When I take panoramas have always some doubt about the depth sufficiency 'of field and diffraction thought was compensated from heaven, not completely clear. Hello and thanks for the criticism Gianfranco :-P Ciao Lauro, sono contento di risentirti, le dominanti verdi sono dovute forse ad un mio errore utilizzando il picture control del software capture nxd (fluorescenza a colori controllati). Per quanto riguarda il sensore la pulizia e' gia' stata fatta. Pensi che f20 siano troppi?? bastava f16? Quando riprendo panorami ho sempre qualche dubbio sulla sufficienza della profondita' di campo e per la diffrazione pensavo fosse compensata dal cielo non completamente sereno. Ciao e grazie per le critiche Gianfranco |
| sent on August 16, 2016 (13:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Diffraction (light wave detour through the disc) depends on the construction of the slats, by the construction of the lenses and the closing value of the diaphragm. I had this lens and usually stopped to F.11-f13, you can push yourself up to a maximum of F.16 - than you lose in sharpness. If you need to stretch in a bit of shutter speeds and recourse rather to a good f.polarizzatore. (Imho) Hello, Lauro La diffrazione (deviazione dell'onda luminosa attraverso l'otturatore) dipende dalla costruzione delle lamelle, dalla costruzione delle lenti e dal valore di chiusura del diaframma. Ho avuto questa lente e di solito mi fermavo a f.11-f13 , puoi spingerti fino ad un massimo di f.16 - oltre si perde in nitidezza. Se hai bisogno di allungare un pelino il tempo di scatto ricorri semmai ad un buon f.polarizzatore . (imho) Ciao, Lauro |
| sent on August 16, 2016 (14:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Lauro polarizer and 'always present. hello Gianfranco :-P Grazie Lauro il polarizzatore e' sempre presente. ciao Gianfranco |
| sent on August 24, 2017 (8:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
You really are right, a beautiful alpine pond; Lucky to you that you could walk it long and wide, but also very good at how you knew how to get it back: great shots! Happy tree day Hai veramente ragione, un laghetto alpino bellissimo; fortunato te che hai potuto percorrerlo in lungo e in largo, ma anche bravissimo a come hai saputo riprenderlo: gran bei scatti! Felice giornata alberto |
| sent on August 24, 2017 (11:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Alberto Hello Gianfranco :-P grazie Alberto ciao Gianfranco |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |