What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 16, 2016 (10:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
the last on the right, thanks l'ultimo a destra, grazie |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Peppe!
I make the transfer ..... ??? Ciao Peppe!
Mi fai il bonifico.....??? |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Meanwhile, you send it to me, then I see tu intanto mandamelo, poi vedo |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (10:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
But it pesantino ..... Però è pesantino..... |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (11:57) | This comment has been translated
Spectacular |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (13:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Andy41sbk!
Hello
Julian Grazie Andy41sbk!
Ciao
Giuliano |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (14:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Five interesting 180-200! Focal for me beautiful. Nikon and leica 2.8 apo may not materialize sooner or later, even from me. Curious also very 3.4 .. Cinque interessantissimi 180-200! Focale per me bellissima. Il Nikon e il leica 2,8 non apo potrebbero prima o poi concretizzarsi anche da me. Mi incuriosisce molto anche il 3,4.. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (14:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I had that too, but I sold it to a friend.
Great goal!
Hello
Julian Avevo anche quello ma l'ho venduto ad un amico.
Ottimo obiettivo!
Ciao
Giuliano |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (16:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nikon I would use it on mirrorless .. Switch between the previous version and the MF AF, optically speaking? Il nikon lo userei su mirrorless.. Cambia tra la precedente versione MF e quella AF, otticamente parlando? |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (17:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The Af version is better but I did not try it personally. La versione Af è migliore ma io non l'ho provata personalmente. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (18:09) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Merci!
But if I want to modernity, at this point I move on canon ... From vintage lenses are good enough for me that you have something to say. Merci!
Però se voglio la modernità, a questo punto mi muovo su canon... Dai vintage mi basta che siano buone lenti che abbiano qualcosa da dire. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Modern so to speak ......
Keep in mind that the fixed Canon are as old as the Nikon.
Moderne per modo di dire......
Tieni presente che i fissi Canon sono vecchi quanto i Nikon.
|
| sent on July 16, 2016 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here the 180 mm. Nikon Fuji s5 pro (270mm.)
Qui il 180 mm. Nikon su Fuji s5 pro ( 270mm.) |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, modernity meant automatic fire! :-)
Nikon ED glass tends to be sharper in the TA Leica not apo? From your picture seems very balanced view, although the Fuji sensor helps ...
Sì, per modernità intendevo il fuoco automatico! 
Il Nikon con vetri ED è tendenzialmente più nitido a TA del Leica non apo? Dalla tua foto mi pare un'ottica molto equilibrata, anche se il sensore fuji aiuta...
|
| sent on July 16, 2016 (19:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well ... but my Nikon autofocus!
We say that is more or less the Leica ELMARIT 2.8 R not apo. Beh...ma il mio Nikon ha l'autofocus!
Diciamo che vale più o meno il Leica elmarit 2,8 R non apo. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (19:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
How is the manual focus with Nikon AF? I'd use in MF of mirrorless, I do not know if it would be better version manual focus, or the one used AF MF .. Not in the least know the Nikon AF and its rings. Com'è la messa a fuoco manuale con il Nikon AF? Io lo userei in MF su mirrorless, non so se sarebbe meglio la versione a fuoco manuale, oppure quella AF usata MF.. Non conosco minimamente gli AF Nikon e le relative ghiere. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (19:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very valuable, no games and precisa.Tieni that this 180 was the only serious competitor of the Leitz 3.4 apo, which equaled 4.5 from the diaphragm up. Validissima ,senza giochi e precisa.Tieni presente che questo 180 era l'unico serio concorrente del Leitz 3,4 apo, che eguagliava dal diaframma 4,5 in su. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
One of the rare photos taken with Nikon 180 and af and Nikon D800.
Una delle rare foto scattate con Nikon 180 af ed e Nikon D800. |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (21:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
85, 100, but especially 135, 180/200 and 300 are my favorite focal. Nikon could be an interesting alternative to Sonnar, which is very balanced but does not excel in risolvenza. I had the Tamron 2.5 of the 25th anniversary, but TA E until F4 and over had more of AC Sonnar that Apo is not. Leica me quite intrigued to 3.4, and of course your two. But I'd look at the first revolutionary 3.4 :) 85, 100, ma soprattutto 135, 180/200 e 300 sono le mie focali preferite. Il nikon potrebbe essere una simpatica alternativa al sonnar, che é molto bilanciato ma non eccelle in risolvenza. Ho avuto il tamron 2,5 del 25esimo anniversario, ma a T.A. E sino a F4 e oltre Aveva più AC del Sonnar, che Apo non é. Dei Leica mi intriga parecchio il 3,4, oltre ovviamente ai tuoi due. Ma di mio punterei al primo rivoluzionario 3,4 :) |
| sent on July 16, 2016 (23:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I've had a lot of Apo-TELYT 3.4 .....
Great but with Mass minimum fire too long (2.5 m.) Also the focus fire helical turns, turns, it never ends ....
For digital just 2.8 first type and spend less than half. Ne ho avuti tanti di Apo-telyt 3,4.....
Ottimo ma con messa fuoco minima troppo lunga ( 2,5 m.) inoltre l'elicoide di messa fuoco gira,gira,non finisce mai....
Per il digitale basta il 2,8 primo tipo e spendi meno della metà. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
20.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
