What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 15, 2012 (12:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Always nice to see the Milky Way, how high were you?
You could to catch a glimpse of the Milky Way with the naked eye?
You can see too much distortion in Ancoli photo, the stars there are too elongated, have you tried to correct the distortion?
Or maybe you did and just that stretched the stars?
Sempre bello vedere la Via Lattea, a che altitudine ti trovavi?
Riuscivi ad intravedere la Via Lattea ad occhio nudo?
Si intravede troppa distorsione negli ancoli della foto, le stelle lì sono troppo allungate, hai provato a correggere la distorsione?
O forse l'hai fatto e proprio questo ha allungato le stelle?
|
| sent on July 16, 2012 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The altitude is about 1400. you could see the Milky Way with the naked eye. The distortion in the corners is almost inevitable, at least that it does not reduce the shutter speed. Greetings L'altitudine è di 1400 circa. la via lattea si vedeva benissimo a occhio nudo. La distorsione negli angoli è quasi inevitabile, almeno che non si riduca il tempo di scatto. Un saluto |
| sent on July 16, 2012 (17:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Attention, the elongation of the stars in the corners has nothing to do with the apparent motion of the stars, but the distortion lens used.
Otherwise, in the area of ??Sagittarius the stars should be even longer than the corners, due to the greater speed of the stars positioned along the equator.
Attenzione, l'allungamento delle stelle sugli angoli non ha nulla a che vedere con il moto apparente degli astri, bensì alla distorsione dell'obbiettivo usato.
Altrimenti nella zona del Sagittario le stelle dovrebbero essere ancora più lunghe degli angoli, vista la maggiore velocità apparente delle stelle posizionate lungo l'equatore.
|
| sent on July 16, 2012 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
D'agree more with you, the distortion is always there, but with a lower shutter speed is seen everywhere less. Almost the same shot but at 20 seconds and I can assure you that you will notice less. Greetings D'accordissimo con te, la distorsione c'è sempre, però con un tempo di scatto minore la si nota molto meno. Quasi stesso scatto ma a 20 secondi e ti assicuro che si nota meno. Un saluto |
| sent on February 23, 2013 (18:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gosh I envy ... She did not know how to do these ... Cribbio che invidia... Non le so fare queste... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
