What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 11, 2016 (19:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful and suggestive image, from what I read in the data, you have set very well the SLR and in fact it has come out a beautiful picture, congratulations :-) Hello, Renzo Bella e suggestiva immagine , da quel che leggo sui dati , hai impostato molto bene la reflex ed infatti ne è uscita una bella foto , complimenti Ciao , Renzo |
| sent on July 11, 2016 (19:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much davvero..non have observed only the photo but you saw it all oltre..non also observe the exif Grazie mille davvero..non hai osservato solo la foto ma hai visto oltre..non è da tutti osservare anche gli exif |
| sent on August 03, 2016 (13:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A question from the neophyte ... ISO 500 so you've turned up, only to hold the aperture f / 14? Una domanda da neofita …l'ISO 500 l'hai così alzato, al solo fine di tenere fermo il diaframma f/14? |
| sent on August 03, 2016 (16:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, right.. Si esatto.. |
| sent on August 03, 2016 (21:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In essence, for landscapes, I saw that the diaphragms that uses, ranging from f / 8 to f / 14-16. What is the rationale that drives you to not exceed f / 16? Sorry if I bombed ... ... with the F / 16! :) Thank you See you soon In buona sostanza, per i paesaggi, ho visto che i diaframmi che usi, vanno da f/8 a f/14-16. Qual è la ratio che ti spinge a non oltrepassare un f/16? Scusa se ti bombardo …con …l'F/16! :) Grazie A presto |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (7:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well it depends on circostanza..in this case I wanted to have a fast enough time as it was windy and the clouds were moving a lot and secondly because it was a shot made on the fly and I set the values ??as fast as possible Beh dipende dalla circostanza..in questo caso ho voluto avere un tempo abbastanza veloce visto che tirava vento e le nuvole si muovevano molto e poi anche perché è stato uno scatto fatto al volo e ho regolato i valori il più velocemente possibile |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (10:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then (and not torment you any more ...) you were in Manual and not (as I thought) in aperture priority? Thanks for everything and good day Marcello Quindi (e non ti tormento più...) eri in Manuale e non (come pensavo io) in priorità di diaframma? Grazie di tutto e buona giornata Marcello |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (11:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
No no..non never use the automatic settings or always semiautomatico..scatto and strictly manual No no..non uso mai le impostazioni automatiche o semiautomatico..scatto sempre e rigorosamente in manuale |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (17:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Marco ..buon advice! Hello and good afternoon Marcello Grazie Marco ..buon consiglio! Ciao e buon pomeriggio Marcello |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (17:30) | This comment has been translated
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |