What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 04, 2016 (13:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photo is a little suffered from a lack of sharpness, perhaps also due to the time a little longer for a maximum telephoto position, and to the large aperture (f5) .Avresti could raise the ISO until a time equal to the lens focal length used, namely a 1/150, 1/200 or better still 1 / 250.Sono a couple of stops, so ISO 400 would bastati.Cmq, photos "tasty", delicious cherries.
Hi Alessandro La foto è un po penalizzata dalla mancanza di nitidezza,forse dovuta anche al tempo un po lungo per una focale tele, ed al diaframma molto aperto(f5).Avresti potuto alzare gli ISO fino ad ottenere un tempo pari alla focale usata,ossia un 1/150,meglio ancora 1/200 o 1/250.Sono un paio di stop,quindi 400 Iso sarebbero bastati.Cmq,foto "gustosa",buonissime le ciliegie.
Ciao,Alessandro |
| sent on July 04, 2016 (19:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hi Alessandro,
Thank you very much for the advice, I appreciate the technical opinion because they are a beginner and I have so much to learn. I explain to you; I always have a bit of "fear" to raise the ISO as well as 400/800 noise is evident with the EOS m. But in this case I think you're right, next time I'll try :-) :-D Ciao Alessandro,
Grazie mille per il consiglio, apprezzo il parere tecnico perché sono alle prime armi e ho tanto da imparare. Ti spiego; ho sempre un po di "paura" ad alzare gli ISO in quanto anche a 400/ 800 il rumore risulta evidente con la EOS m . Però in questo caso penso tu abbia ragione, la prossima volta proverò   |
| sent on July 04, 2016 (21:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, I understand your concern about the noise lurking, even I with the 7D I have to take this into account, so that I do not ever push over 640Iso, but I think 400 is not too many, so I allowed the council, while not knowing your ML. Unfortunately, the three values, ISO, shutter speed, aperture are closely linked, and if the wide-angle problems are minimal, so as not to have problems, such as with a 24mm or 28mm to use 1/30 or 1/50, with telephoto emerge, blur and camera shake in the first place. Si,capisco il tuo timore per il rumore in agguato,anche io con la 7D devo tenerne conto,tanto che non mi spingo mai sopra i 640Iso,ma penso che 400 non siano troppi,per questo mi sono permesso il consiglio,pur non conoscendo la tua ML. Purtroppo,i tre valori,Iso,tempo,diaframma sono strettamente collegati,e se con i grandangoli i problemi sono minimi,tanto da non avere problemi,esempio,con un 24mm o un 28mm ad usare 1/30 o 1/50,con focali tele emergono,mosso e micromosso in primis. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
17.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
