What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 21, 2016 (5:50) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on June 21, 2016 (10:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Then, the shot itself is not bad, with the fifth of the vegetation that much of the wild shooting, you must have messed in post production, 58.6 mpx do not come from a d810 :-D Allora, lo scatto in se non è male, con la quinta della vegetazione che da molto dello scatto wild, devi aver pasticciato in post produzione, 58.6 mpx non escono da un d810 |
| sent on June 21, 2016 (11:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In fact ... I fear the meaning of the word "crop and int." 8-), I think you've done something wrong. In effetti... temo il significato della scritta "crop e int." , mi sa che hai combinato qualcosa di strano. |
| sent on June 21, 2016 (14:11) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on June 21, 2016 (22:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice catch. PP recupererei whites to the limit ;-) Bella cattura. In PP recupererei i bianchi al limite |
| sent on June 22, 2016 (15:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I thank you, as indeed told by Alexander the shot is cropped and then interpolated to retrieve definition. Let's say that I really like the mess co Pixy !!! :-D But do not hide it ... ;-) Vi ringrazio, come effettivamente detto da Alessandro lo scatto è croppato e successivamente interpolato per recuperare definizione. Diciamo che mi piace molto pasticciare co i Pixy!!! ma non lo nascondo... |
| sent on June 22, 2016 (15:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
L 'interpolation may make sense for the large format printing and to help a little before a crop in ps (never more than 120% and then you have to redo a resize down), the rest is just a pejorative, to monitor always show an 'image less sharp, because the invented pixels are the average of those around ;-) L' interpolazione può avere un senso per la stampa di grandi formati e per aiutare un pò prima di un crop in ps ( mai oltre il 120% e poi bisogna rifare un resize verso il basso ), per il resto è solo peggiorativo, a monitor mostrerà sempre un' immagine meno nitida, perchè i pixel inventati sono la media di quelli intorno |
| sent on June 22, 2016 (18:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Roberto, I can guarantee that the interpolation is to advantage in all, if well utilized. The huge advantage you have on images with base resolution between 10 and 20MP interpolated up to double, (with the right algorithm), as well as I personally deem imperceptible. I showed comparative results to skeptics that after seeing the results could not believe their eyes. Nevertheless I admit that in this case was excessive -D, but better than does the less ... ;-) Ciao Roberto, posso garantirti che l'interpolazione è a vantaggio in tutto, se ben utilizzata. Il vantaggio enorme lo hai su immagini con risoluzione base tra i 10 e i 20Mp interpolate fino al doppio, (con il giusto algoritmo), oltre lo reputo personalmente impercettibile. Ho mostrato risultati comparativi a scettici che dopo aver visto i risultati non credevano ai loro occhi. Ciò nonostante ammetto che in questo caso è stato eccessivo , ma meglio in più che in meno... |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |