What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 24, 2016 (16:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful portrait, excellent light management, go to taste the second eye out of focus .....
Compliments
Fonzie Bel ritratto, ottima la gestione della luce, va a gusti il secondo occhio fuori fuoco.....
Complimenti
Fonzie |
| sent on May 24, 2016 (17:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Portrait very beautiful, even if the light that I see on the face does not do justice to the nature of the background tones. The second eye out of focus does not detract from the pleasantness of the picture :) Ritratto molto bello, anche se la luce che vedo sul viso non rende giustizia alla natura dei toni dello sfondo. Il secondo occhio fuori fuoco non toglie nulla alla gradevolezza della foto :) |
| sent on May 24, 2016 (18:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the comment ... Fonz regarding the sfocatro of the second eye is wanted, I like very much the 135 F2, and then I can just use it in TA, however, are tastes.
Hello
Giuseppe
Grazie del commento Fonzie... per quanto riguarda lo sfocatro del secondo occhio è voluto, a me piace moltissimo il 135 F2, e quindi appena posso lo uso a TA, comunque sono gusti.
Ciao
Giuseppe
|
| sent on May 24, 2016 (18:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Biagio LR, regarding the difference of light, her face had a reflective panel that "reflected" the direct sunlight (it was about 14 and the sun beat down. "
thanks and bye
Giuseppe Grazie Biagio LR, per quanto riguarda la differenza di luce, sul viso avevo un pannello riflettente che "rifletteva" la luce diretta del sole (erano circa le 14 ed il sole picchiava".
grazie e ciao
Giuseppe |
user59947 | sent on May 24, 2016 (20:04) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on May 25, 2016 (12:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks passage of Ardian
Hello Joseph Grazie del passaggio Ardian
Ciao Giuseppe |
| sent on June 01, 2016 (11:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I now see Joseph. I preferred the previous year; known in this (IMHO) you've used a large aperture with 135 (perhaps for the blurred?), and this has helped you in the sharpness in general. If it was designed to make ethereal and dreamlike image ..... then it is ok. However, that right eye I just can not make me pleasure :-D :-P
enry Vedo ora Giuseppe. Preferivo la precedente; in questa noto (IMHO) che hai usato un diaframma molto aperto con il 135 (forse per lo sfocato?) e questo non ti ha aiutato nella nitidezza in generale. Se invece era pensato per rendere eterea e onirica l'immagine.....allora è ok. Però quell'occhio destro non riesco proprio a farmelo piacere  
Enry |
| sent on June 01, 2016 (12:15) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Great beautiful portrait. Compliments!
Anna Maria Gran bel ritratto. Complimenti!
Annamaria |
| sent on June 02, 2016 (13:07) | This comment has been translated
Thanks Annamaria... |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (11:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Here .... beautiful picture eh ... but is exactly what I (personally, I do not speak for the other!) I will NOT get with a portrait: this is why I love, but at the same "fear" optical bright. .... (and a 2 135, at home, it is not!) ..
To concentrate to get a sensational blurred, you lose sight of the person who must be photographing ....
Anyway congratulations for the photos .... I also looked at the other, very beautiful ... Ecco....bellissima la foto eh...ma rappresenta esattamente quello che io (personalmente, non parlo per gli altri!) NON voglio ottenere con un ritratto: un occhio a fuoco, e l'altro "quasi"....o per nulla!... per questo motivo amo, ma al contempo "temo" le ottiche luminosissime.....(e un 135 2, a casa, lo è!) ..
Per concentrarsi ad ottenere uno sfocato sensazionale, si perde di vista il soggetto che si deve fotografare....
In ogni caso complimenti per le foto....ho guardato anche le altre, molto belle... |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (11:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I preferred to both eyes fuoco..questione of taste.
If I had closed at 2.8 / 3.2 would not have changed much background :-P Anch'io preferivo entrambi gli occhi a fuoco..questione di gusti.
Se avessi chiuso a 2.8/3.2 non avrebbe cambiato tanto lo sfondo |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (11:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree .... 135 is a nice long, even a bit 'closed still leaves it very soft background .... Concordo....un 135 è bello lungo, anche un po' chiuso lascia comunque lo sfondo molto sfumato.... |
| sent on August 04, 2016 (12:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the ride and Tzeol comments.
Greetings Giuseppe
Grazie del passaggio e dei commenti Tzeol.
Un saluto Giuseppe
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
