What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 22, 2016 (21:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
this with the low iso definitely better questa con gli iso bassi decisamente meglio |
| sent on May 22, 2016 (21:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would put the heron in the foreground not moving it at the top. still good shot. Io avrei messo l'airone in primo piano non spostandolo nella parte alta. comunque buono scatto. |
| sent on May 22, 2016 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not like the composition, too much vegetation. I would rather see the subject with a closer shot. Non mi piace la composizione, troppa vegetazione. Avrei preferito vedere il soggetto con una inquadratura più stretta. |
| sent on May 22, 2016 (22:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks, in my archive will modify 'as suggested by you. Grazie, nel mio archivio modifichero' come suggerito da voi. |
| sent on May 23, 2016 (11:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad, I would have put myself the heron lower and not as moved up. Then all that vegetation distracts a bit 'attention to the fact. Non male, avrei messo anch'io l'airone più in basso e non così spostato in alto. Poi tutta quella vegetazione distoglie un po' l'attenzione effettivamente. |
| sent on May 24, 2016 (22:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I fully agree with that centering the heron taking off the lower part of the shot would acquire importance the protagonist. For the vegetation is' is present but also makes it more wild, more true, as some do not doubt that this is an animal in captivity, so to speak, and I like that. They are not an expert, indeed, but I like this one because it is the reality. Condivido in pieno che centrando l'airone togliendo la parte bassa dello scatto acquisterebbe importanza il protagonista. Per la vegetazione è' si presente ma la rende anche più wild, più vera, non da certo il dubbio che si tratti di un animale in cattività per intenderci, e questo mi piace. Non sono assolutamente un esperto, anzi, ma questa mi piace perché rappresenta la realtà. |
| sent on May 27, 2016 (8:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello! This seems like the best of the three shots posted. The subject is well acclimatized and positioned (rule of thirds respected). I like the juxtaposition of heron and tin in the opposite sides of the shot.
Unfortunately nell'avifauna the maf and niditezza of the subject make the photo. This would be fine to highlight the presence of a given species in a given area. ciao! Questo mi sembra il migliore dei tre scatti postati. Il soggetto è ben ambientato e posizionato (regola dei terzi rispettata). Mi piace la contrapposizione di airone e stagno nelle parti opposte dello scatto. Purtroppo nell'avifauna la maf e la niditezza del soggetto fanno la foto. Questa andrebbe bene per evidenziare la presenza di una data specie in una determinata zona. |
| sent on May 27, 2016 (12:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It 's true, I almost never did nature photos, I'm trying. thank you E' vero, non ho quasi mai fatto foto naturalistiche, ci sto provando. grazie |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |