JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on May 13, 2016 (15:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful the soggiotto and photo cut. I am not convinced at all the fire management, especially the pylon in the foreground and a part of the tree on the left. Hello Bello il soggiotto e il taglio della foto. Non mi convince del tutto la gestione del fuoco, specialmente il pilone in primo piano e una parte dell'albero a sinistra. ciao
sent on May 13, 2016 (16:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you for picking me up. The back chick I kept it because, in a way, is an interruption of lines of flight bringing back, with his eyes, the carrier to the right. Mattefra I did not understand what you mean, you would have turned a bit 'the diaphragm? Grazie per il passaggio. La tizia di schiena l'ho tenuta perché, in un certo modo, è un'interruzione delle linee di fuga riportando, col suo sguardo, il vettore verso destra. Mattefra non ho capito bene cosa intendi, avresti chiuso un po' il diaframma?
sent on May 13, 2016 (18:27) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Funny, she does not disturb, she is watching by following the gaze of the rabbit, sometimes things in the foreground blurry give some noise, but given the subject, we can stand cordially Beppe Divertente,la ragazza non disturba,sta guardando seguendo la sguardo del coniglio,alle volte le cose in primo piano sfocate danno un poco di disturbo,ma dato il soggetto ,ci può stare cordialmente Beppe
sent on May 13, 2016 (18:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful I like, I giocaco with colors to make uu little more nostalgic, but in the context I like Bella mi piace, avrei giocaco con i colori per renderla uu poco più nostalgica ma nel contesto mi piace
sent on May 13, 2016 (19:44) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find it sad ;-), for the appearance of the rabbit via: bunny suicide :-D [URL =] La trovo triste, per via dell'aspetto del coniglio: bunny suicide
user92930
sent on May 14, 2016 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The photos do not mind a compositional level. There is balance and harmony.
But I find overexposed. Too much light in the sky, in the street floor, on the branches of trees to SX. La foto non mi dispiace a livello compositivo. C'è equilibrio ed armonia.
Ma la trovo sovraesposta. Troppa luce nel cielo, nel pavimento della strada, sui rami degli alberi a SX.
sent on May 14, 2016 (13:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Nino, if I'm not mistaken the fire falls on the second pillar, not the rabbit; when there are too many elements in the shot and generally also in a portrait (unless it is not the particular one part of the face), you should avoid using a diaphragm so open. Ciao Nino, se non sbaglio il fuoco ricade su secondo pilastro e non sul coniglio; quando ci sono troppi elementi nello scatto e in generale anche in un ritratto ( a meno che non sia il particolare di una sola parte del volto), dovresti evitare di usare un diaframma così aperto.