What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on July 02, 2012 (23:21) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Personal observation, I would have focused on the first of two children! Considerazione personale ,io avrei messo a fuoco il primo dei due piccini!!! |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
as above come sopra |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (21:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto very nice Quoto molto bella |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (21:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
excellent photo ottima foto |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (21:53) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice even so. Molto bella anche così. |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (22:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree! .. By the way I understand the choice of your shot .. but 'perhaps it has closed a couple more stop ... maybe 3 ... you had an image more' pleasant ... my considerations .. by neophyte! ! ciauu Concordo!..dal titolo capisco la scelta del tuo scatto..pero' forse aver chiuso un altro paio di stop...forse 3...avresti avuti un'immagine piu' piacevole...considerazioni mie..da neofita!!ciauu |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (22:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
very very nice molto molto bella |
| sent on July 25, 2012 (22:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I understand and appreciate your thoughts about the priority of focusing on the subject in the foreground. ;-) However I would like to enter into the merits to express my opinion on the shoot because I have been the author (although this claim the superiority of my thinking). :-) I begin with the title for obvious reasons I found it fitting since the composition of your shot and for having focused attention on the second floor ......... I've definitely thought a priori! wow! I shoot instinctively and for a moment I wanted to abandon the classical canons of photography who want a close-up more present with a dedicated focus. Somewhere I read years ago that look at a picture with a blurred foreground is like reading a book without a preface .......... and I found myself in aagreement when, but in this case, for this type of composition, focus on the first subject would lead the viewer's eye immediately out of range and would make it unattractive the rest of the scene behind him because there would be a continuous blur without interruptions. Finally, for both subjects in focus, I had to raise the iso besides close a lot of the diaphragm with a probable loss of quality, worth getting a shot at the edge of the rough, (formerly f / 8 at 1/400 sec.'ve Risked long as the two parties were moving). Thank you all for expressing your own opinion and in any case the maximum respect for opposing views. Hello Capisco ed apprezzo le vostre considerazioni riguardo la priorità della messa a fuoco sul soggetto in primo piano. Tuttavia desidero entrare nel merito per esprimere anche il mio parere sullo scatto visto che ne sono stato l'artefice (senza per questo vantare la superiorità del mio pensiero). Comincio dal titolo che per ovvie ragioni l'ho trovato calzante visto la composizione dello scatto e soprattutto per aver concentrato l'attenzione sul secondo piano.........non l'ho assolutamente pensato a priori! Ho scattato d'istinto e per un attimo ho voluto abbandonare i classici canoni della fotografia che vogliono un primo piano più presente con una messa a fuoco dedicata. Da qualche parte ho letto anni addietro che guardare una foto con un primo piano sfuocato è come leggere un libro senza la prefazione..........e mi sono trovato d'accordo; ma in questo caso, per questo tipo di composizione, mettere a fuoco il primo soggetto avrebbe portato lo sguardo dell'osservatore immediatamente fuori campo e avrebbe reso poco attraente il resto della scena alle sue spalle visto che ci sarebbe stato uno sfuocato continuo senza interruzioni . Infine, per avere entrambi i soggetti a fuoco, avrei dovuto alzare gli iso oltrechè chiudere tantissimo il diaframma con una probabile perdita di qualità, pena ottenere uno scatto al limite del mosso, (già a f/8 con 1/400 di sec. ho rischiato parecchio visto che i due soggetti erano in movimento). Grazie a tutti per avere espresso un vostro parere ed in ogni caso massimo rispetto per le opinioni opposte. Ciao |
user8602 | sent on July 26, 2012 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The rules are made to be broken ;-) I really like the way it is. Hello and good photos. Le regole sono fatte per essere infrante A me piace molto così com'è. Ciao e buone foto. |
| sent on July 26, 2012 (9:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
and me too I agree with momo! e pure io son d'accordo con momo! |
| sent on July 26, 2012 (14:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice and sweet and nice! ;-) Bella e dolce e simpatica! |
| sent on July 26, 2012 (17:19) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I find the shot balanced taking into account the fuzzy nature (according to subject) and the fuzzy induced (both reflections) I really like:-P Trovo lo scatto equilibrato tenendo conto dello sfuocato naturale(secondo soggetto) e dello sfuocato indotto(entrambi i riflessi) Mi piace molto |
|

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |