What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on April 26, 2016 (18:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
A photo is striking!
The painting, abstract, wrong (I think deliberately), and do not know why but I guess it had bright colors, which could distract from the subject.
Trick "energetic" and flash effect + exasperated shadows.
Model sitting, but in a rigid position.
A picture proposed in the "naked" gallery where you can not see even a nipple.
You have carefully examined the standards of the industry, and have undermined them all. The effect is strong!
The only fee that would not violated is to the feet: I do not know why, but I would have preferred maybe clenched fists and feet "toe". But even for thoseor is part of the innocent "rebellion", I guess.
Una foto che colpisce!
Il quadro, astratto, storto (credo volutamente), e non so perché ma immagino che avesse colori accesi, che avrebbero potuto distrarre dal soggetto.
Trucco "energico" ed effetto flash+ombre esasperato.
Modella seduta, ma in una posizione rigida.
Una foto proposta nella galleria "nudo" nella quale non si vede nemmeno un capezzolo.
Hai esaminato attentamente i canoni del settore, e li hai scardinati tutti. L'effetto è forte!
L'unico canone che non avrei violato è quello dei piedi: non so perché, ma avrei preferito magari i pugni chiusi e i piedi "in punta". Ma anche quello fa parte della innocente "ribellione", immagino.
|
| sent on April 26, 2016 (19:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
generally not for me including the colors that I see tends to magenta ... but already the exterminates feet departing.
as certainly revisit. Hello globalmente per me no compresa la cromia che io vedo tendente al magenta...ma già i piedi stroncano in partenza.
da rivedere certamente. ciao |
| sent on April 27, 2016 (0:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Absolutely no. photo leaning to the right, dominant magenta, standing preposterous. You also wrong gallery. Assolutamente no. foto pendente a destra, dominante magenta, piedi improponibili. Hai pure sbagliato galleria. |
| sent on April 27, 2016 (8:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not to mention the flash! Per non parlare del flash! |
| sent on April 27, 2016 (10:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
The author was in a hurry? :-D L'autore andava di fretta?  |
| sent on April 28, 2016 (17:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thank you all for the criticism, always very constructive !!!!
ignatius have flattered
valter specialist, because the wrong gallery ???? the model is naked except for the scarf, if I'm wrong I 90% of those who publish boudoir wrong gallery !!!! grazie a tutti per le critiche, sempre molto costruttive!!!!
ignatius sono lusingato
valter specia, perchè sbagliato galleria???? la modella è nuda a parte il foulard, se ho sbagliato io il 90% di chi pubblica boudoir sbaglia galleria!!!! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
