Nurallao, Is Arinus PmP38794_HDR10

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

1.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Cascate in Sardegna View gallery (11 photos)

Nurallao, Is Arinus PmP38794_HDR10 sent on March 17, 2016 (23:33) by Piermariopilloni. 2 comments, 271 views.

, 3.2 sec f/16.0, ISO 100, tripod.

Ho voluto provare una tecnica...da un unico file raw ho generato con Nikon Capture NX cinque file tiff con diversi livelli di esposizione (-2,-1,0,+1,+2) che poi ho utilizzato per creare dei file HDR con HDR Efex Pro plug-in di Photoshop...questo nei file che nel titolo riportano la sigla HDR. Il numero dopo la sigla HDR indica il tipo di preset utilizzato. Vorrei un parere se preferite la versione HDR o quella normale.

View High Resolution 1.9 MP

4 persons like it: Banner, Ignazioatzeni, Luigi Cappucci, Sestri1970

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Sestri1970

sent on March 18, 2016 (7:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Personally, in this case, I prefer the HDR version, and this particular photo is the one I like better; shame about the thin branch at the bottom left (but I guess I could not do anything to remove it :-)).
In my opinion it would have been interesting to try with an ND filter 400 and a 48 "exposure time to f8 or 96" at f11 .... maybe the results would have exceeded even the HDR version.
Bye and have a good day :-)

Piermariopilloni

sent on March 18, 2016 (12:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you .... with that light you can not use filters. Curiously, with the HDR processing ghosting of moving water it tends to decrease, as if I had taken more rapidly, whereas the photos that make up the HDR are five variants of the same original photo, which differ only the density but aperture and shutter speed are the same ... I do not know the effect, I try a different preset with HDR

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.