What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 21, 2012 (10:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not see a maf precise resulting in a loss of detail; share "burned" in the roost.
Hello, Stephen. Non vedo una maf precisa con conseguente perdita di dettaglio; parti "bruciate" nel posatoio.
Ciao, Stefano. |
| sent on June 25, 2013 (15:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I would try a resume point lower, is not very clear and very strong light penalizes it, as told by Stephen there are parts burned in the roost, and dark wings with little detail. hello ;-) avrei cercato un punto di ripresa più basso, non è molto nitida e la luce molto forte la penalizza, come detto da Stefano ci sono parti bruciate nel posatoio, e ali scure con poco dettaglio. ciao  |
| sent on December 28, 2015 (19:34) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Nice person, too bad you do not seem focused properly. perhaps the equipment and the free hand did not help ... Bel soggetto, peccato non sembri correttamente a fuoco. forse l'attrezzatura e il mano libera non ti ha aiutato... |
| sent on July 20, 2016 (19:41) | This comment has been translated
Nice! |
| sent on April 10, 2020 (15:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
True it's not well in focus, but the subject is fantastic. I don't think it's a dragonfly, it's definitely a dentist, but given the wings and the "eyes," I'd say it belongs to the undertone of the cheekbones. Vero che non è ben a fuoco, ma il soggetto è fantastico. Non credo sia una libellula, sicuramente è un odonato, ma viste le ali e gli "occhi", direi che appartiene al sottordine degli zigotteri. |
| sent on April 11, 2020 (9:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It's hard to portray this subject with a free hand. The focus is not precise and on the perch there are burnt areas. The subject is, as always, of great appeal. A greeting Difficile ritrarre questo soggetto a mano libera. La messa a fuoco non è precisa e sul posatoio ci sono aree bruciate. Il soggetto è come sempre di grande appeal. Un saluto |
| sent on April 12, 2020 (19:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
a free love that unfortunately suffers from obvious lack of sharpness un amno libera che purtroppo soffre di evidente mancanza di nitidezza |
| sent on November 18, 2021 (12:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately it seems that the free hand has penalized the recovery of this demigella. Given the brightness of the rood you should have compensated for the exposure. Purtroppo sembra che il mano libera abbia penalizzato la ripresa di questa damigella. Visto la luminosità del posatoio avresti dovuto compensare l'esposizione. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
Resize to fit window
