Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Landscape (wilderness)

1.4 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Nikon1 S1 View gallery (18 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on March 07, 2016 (22:18) by Xaw. 9 comments, 945 views.

, 1/250 f/8.0, ISO 100, hand held.

View High Resolution 1.4 MP

3 persons like it: Flaber70, NaCapaTanta, Seby80

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Daniele Delfino

sent on May 18, 2016 (19:52) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Very nice development in the BN, not like the composition.
The sky does not present relevant information in addition to the cloud top, cut for no reason. I then framed further down to give more space to the base of the hill and not cut the base of the 'tree. Moreover the latter has also cut on the right, it also consider it a mistake.

NaCapaTanta

sent on May 18, 2016 (20:16) | This comment has been translated

I really like it!

Seby80

sent on May 19, 2016 (0:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The photo is good, nice bw, I darkened the sky a bit to give more prominence to the clouds.

Marconcini Luca

sent on May 19, 2016 (11:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I also agree on the goodness of black and white, not the composition.

Yoctox

sent on May 19, 2016 (12:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Perhaps the cloud at the top would have held off, opting for a panoramic cut. Shooting without infamy and without praise

Xaw

sent on May 19, 2016 (18:33) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I wanted to give greater prominence to the castle of Gerace, darkening the sky did not like the result.
Perhaps the plant to the right, although little cut, it balances the proportion with the sky.
Thanks indications.

Alcy91

sent on May 19, 2016 (22:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

As said earlier, I would have darkened the sky and removed a piece. The black and white is well managed, the photo does not mind at all.

user81257

sent on May 20, 2016 (13:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The hue of the sky I do not mind, cut it, do not bring anything to the photos and binds the rock in a small frame portion.
It almost seems that the protagonist is the plant (cut to another).
A panoramic cut would help a lot, but the photo I think is wrong at the start (in my opinion).

Xaw	sent on May 20, 2016 (14:18) \| This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original) Sara; for me has a certain game of proportions. I give up on the "wrong from the start."

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.