MOON | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Astrophotography

2.3 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Luna e Pianeti - Moon and Planets View gallery (10 photos)

MOON sent on February 25, 2016 (17:12) by Fabioski Sandrini. 6 comments, 936 views.

1/400 f/10.0, ISO 100, tripod.

SW 102/1000 f/9.8 a Fuoco Diretto

View High Resolution 2.3 MP

16 persons like it: Aiello Antonio, Albertopantellini, Fabioviti, Fiorenzo Fiorenza, Franco Molinari, Giampaolo Riva, Mao72, Marcello Ferrari, Marzio Bambini, Mauelle, PablyScarpy, Paoloeffe, Pippo65, Quellolà, Silvio Maccario, Volk_

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 256000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

user28347

sent on February 25, 2016 (19:02)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

veramente dettagliata naturale,col 600?

truly natural, with 600 it detailed?

Fabioski Sandrini

sent on February 25, 2016 (19:20)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

No, ho usato il mio telescopio a fuoco diretto con la D5100. È un rifrattore 1000 102 su montatura EQ5 ;)

No, I used my telescope direct fire with the D5100. It is a refractor on 1000 102 EQ5 mount;)

user28347

sent on February 25, 2016 (20:08)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

col mio telescopio 2000 di focale la luna piena non ci sta tutta,io ho un cassegrain e si vede che il rifrattore è meglio di sicuro

2000 with my telescope focal full moon does not fit all, I have a cassegrain and you see that the refractor is better for sure

Fabioski Sandrini

sent on February 26, 2016 (8:25)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Eh un rifrattore per contrasto sará sempre migliore di un riflettore! Potresti provare a fare un merge con le varie parti che riesci ad osservare! Certo diventa essenziale trovare seeing perfetto...

Eh a refractor by contrast will always be better than a spotlight! You could try to do a merge with the various parts that you can observe! Of course it becomes essential to find the perfect seeing ...

Ahalm

sent on February 29, 2016 (15:56)

wow! fantastic picture!

Fabioski Sandrini

sent on March 08, 2016 (19:41)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Thanks! Grazie! :) follow me!

Thanks! Thank you! :) Follow me!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.