JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on February 16, 2016 (20:08) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Good compo. I find the shooting data a little unusual about the situation: - With F.16 have ensured diffraction (loss of sharpness) - With high ISO noise presence - With underexposure and the subsequent attempt to fill an exaltation of the noise in the dark area During post production has escaped the control of colors (unreal) and the application of a value of the combined beam with the brightness has probably generated unsightly clear halos around the edges. tips: in the coming resetterei naturalistic outputs the photographic approach by setting aperture priority, using diaphragms between f.7,1 and f.8, one pounto af, ai-servant, conservative iso (es.500-640) and considering the 4 ° important parameter that is addedin ISO, shutter speed, aperture ... or exposure compensation (+/- button). (Imho) Dick, laurel Buona la compo . Trovo i dati di scatto un pò anomali per la situazione: - con f.16 hai assicurata la diffrazione (perdita di nitidezza) - con iso alti la presenza del rumore - con la sottoesposizione e il successivo tentativo di schiarita un'esaltazione del rumore nella zona scura Durante la post produzione è sfuggito il controllo dei colori (irreali) e l'applicazione di un valore del raggio combinato con la luminosità ha probabilmente generato degli antiestetici aloni chiari intorno ai contorni. Consigli: nelle prossime uscite naturalistiche resetterei l'approccio fotografico impostando priorità di diaframma, usando diaframmi tra f.7,1 e f.8, un solo pounto di af, ai-servo, iso conservativi (es.500-640) e considerando il 4° parametro importante che si aggiunge a iso, tempo di scatto, diaframma ... ovvero la compensazione dell'esposizione (tasto +/-) . (imho) caio, lauro
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
9.8 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
