What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 15, 2012 (14:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very strong light and bright background it takes a good deal of 8-) 8-) as ever with a light so strong the iso to 160? Luce molto forte e sfondo molto vivace ci vuole una buona dose di  come mai con una luce così forte gli iso a 160? |
| sent on June 15, 2012 (14:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you think I do not know, are the first macro and still do not know how to make a Coretta lighting credi non lo so, sono le prime macro e ancora non so come fare una coretta illuminazione |
| sent on June 15, 2012 (15:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
usually 100 iso should be more than enough, but you can raise when it is cloudy or dark with a light so strong you agreed to put in the shade rather than the subject, if you could not propio could help you make a shadow with your hands or with body, but be careful that if you shade and the subject is awake maybe I'll run away:-D
The composition I like, maybe lacking a bit of detail on the tip of the wings, or the fault of the highlights of the imperfect parallelism.
hello di solito i 100 iso dovrebbero essere più che sufficenti, puoi alzare ma quando è nuvoloso o buio con una luce così forte ti conveniva mettere piuttosto in ombra il soggetto,se propio non ti era possibile potevi aiutarti a fare ombra con le mani o con il corpo,attenzione però che se gli fai ombra e il soggetto è sveglio magari ti scappa via 
La composizione mi piace,forse mancherebbe un pò di dettaglio sulla punta delle ali,colpa delle alte luci o del non perfetto parallelismo.
ciao |
| sent on June 15, 2012 (16:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
hello and thanks for the advice it was early morning at first light, however messso or another picture with a green background it seems to me better, I do not understand how do you make backgrounds so uniform in color and very soft colors. ciao e grazie dei consigli era mattina presto le prime luci, comunque o messso un altra foto con lo sfondo verde mi sembra meglio,non capisco come fate a fare gli sfondi cosi omogenei con colori e cromie molto tenui. |
| sent on June 15, 2012 (16:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
4.30 ALARM first light no sun, you risk burns so far or near background, opening the aperture more, if you want color stains from 16 up, if you want the background layer from 8 down, but be careful most open more risks less detail and maf on the subject (you can still mount a tube front optics, closing af 16 have the homogeneous background)
I hope to be your help, if you need to ask. ;-)
on the green
you used a piece of cardboard as a background? :-P SVEGLIA 4.30 prime luci no sole,si rischiano bruciature così,sfondo lontano o vicino, aprendo di più il diaframma,se vuoi le macchie di colore dai 16 in su,se vuoi lo sfondo omogeneo da 8 in giù,attenzione però più apri più rischi minor dettaglio e maf sul soggetto (puoi sempre montare un tubicino davanti all'ottica,chiudendo a f 16 hai lo sfondo omogeneo)
spero di esserti di aiuto,se hai bisogno chiedi pure.
su quella verde
hai usato un cartoncino come sfondo? |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
8.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
