What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on February 03, 2016 (15:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not understand why to choose a sensitivity of this kind to work on a static subject with that time. Maybe I opted on greater pdc, but always choosing less sensitivity.
If possible I would have avoided the shot of blurred branch to introduce more in the frame of the branch in focus, perhaps by rotating the camera at left. Non capisco perchè scegliere una sensibilità di questo tipo per lavorare su un soggetto statico con quel tempo. Forse avrei optato su una maggiore pdc, ma sempre scegliendo una minor sensibilità.
Se possibile avrei evitato l'inquadratura del ramo sfocato per introdurre maggiormente nel fotogramma il ramo a fuoco, ruotando magari la fotocamera verso sx. |
| sent on February 03, 2016 (15:59) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
sincerely??? believed to be in shutter priority, instead I was in manual with ISO Auto ... In the end the shot I liked it and I let it stay that way ... I only reduced the trouble! Pigi greetings sinceramente??? credevo di essere in priorità tempi, invece ero in manuale con iso Auto... Alla fine lo scatto mi è piaciuto e l'ho lasciato stare così... Ho solo ridotto il disturbo! Saluti Pigi |
| sent on December 04, 2018 (19:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
In addition to what is already recommended by Pigi, on static subjects like this, it is always useful to work on tripod to optimize the focus and avoid moving, even in a millimetric way, after you have focused. At the compositional level I do not convince the blurred branch that crosses the frame in the lower right. Oltre a quanto già consigliato da Pigi, su soggetti statici come questo, è sempre utile lavorare su treppiede per ottimizzare la messa a fuoco ed evitare di muoversi, anche in modo millimetrico, dopo aver focheggiato. A livello compositivo non mi convince il ramo sfocato che attraversa il fotogramma in basso a destra. |
| sent on December 04, 2018 (23:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks for the advice, however the macro is a technique that for now I put on the sidelines... Too much preparation and little photographing... Grazie per i consigli, comunque la macro è una tecnica che per ora ho messo in disparte... Troppa preparazione e poco fotografare... |
| sent on December 06, 2018 (8:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me and "yes, very but very beautiful.
Hello Raymond Per me e" SI, molto ma molto bella.
Ciao Raimondo |
| sent on December 07, 2018 (12:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Raimondo! Grazie Raimondo! |
| sent on June 12, 2019 (22:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Pigi is right, but despite everything I really like the finished result.
I would say very nice, congratulations
Emanuele Pigi ha ragione , ma nonostante tutto a me piace molto comunque il risultato finito.
Direi molto bella , complimenti
Emanuele |
| sent on June 13, 2019 (6:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you so much Emanuele! Grazie mille Emanuele! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
14.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
