What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 12, 2012 (10:54) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very nice photo! It upsets me a bit 'on the fuzzy twig!
Hello and good photos! Foto davvero molto bella !!! Mi disturba un po' lo sfocato sul rametto!!!
Ciao e buone foto!!! |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (10:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Unfortunately, some blades of grass in front of me impallavano the bottom of the frame ... I could remove it but I do not like too much action on the photo ... thanks for the ride! Purtroppo alcuni fili d'erba davanti a me impallavano la parte bassa del fotogramma... avrei potuto rimuoverlo ma non mi piace intervenire troppo sulla foto... grazie del passaggio! |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (10:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
It was just my personal opinion is cmq a nice picture!
Hello
Henry! :-D Era solo un mio parere personale è cmq una bella foto !!!
Ciao
Enrico!!! |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (15:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
nice picture and well composed, not perfectly sharp, shake? I would try with a tap counter and if it is too leave him and schiarirei shadows, try it and let me know. hello valerio bella foto e composta bene, non perfettamente nitida, micromosso? proverei con un colpetto di contrasto e se risultasse troppo lo lascerei e schiarirei le ombre, provaci e fammi sapere. ciao valerio |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (16:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I do not understand where blurred .. you looked at the Hires version? I do not seem to move or mixed .. but I may have different parameters ... for the shadows to lighten mean that the eye is less visible?
Thanks for the advice. Non capisco dov'è poco nitida.. hai guardato la versione Hires? A me non sembra mossa o impastata.. ma forse ho parametri diversi... per le ombre da schiarire intendi sull'occhio che risulta poco visibile?
Grazie per i consigli. |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (17:17) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Hello Cactus my personal and humble opinion it is not mixed, nor a maf wrong, in my opinion is the shake of bee-eater that with a shutter speed slightly slower than necessary to lock it did lose the sharpness.
David Morellini Ciao Cactus mio personale e modesto parere non è ne impastata,ne una maf errata, secondo me è lo scrollarsi del gruccione che con un tempo di scatto leggermente più lento del necessario per bloccarlo ha fatto perdere la nitidezza.
Davide Morellini |
| sent on June 12, 2012 (23:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Cactus is, he's probably right David. hello valerio si Cactus, probabilmente ha ragione Davide. ciao valerio |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (12:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Well then I do not understand .. it is obvious (at least for me) to get a picture in which the movement of the bird is perceptible shrug have to be "moved". The eye and the feathers of the head to me in focus and then felt fine as picture .. if instead the movikmento rotary feathers bother then I screwed up everything.
Thanks for the ride and consugli!
F @ Beh allora non ho capito.. è ovvio (almeno per me) che per avere una foto in cui il movimento dello scrollarsi del volatile sia percepibile deve per forza essere "mosso". L'occhio e le piume della testa a me risultano a fuoco e quindi la ritenevo a posto come foto.. se invece il movikmento rotatorio delle piume da fastidio allora ho cannato tutto.
Grazie del passaggio e dei consugli!
F@ |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (13:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
For me it is a perfect photo. The movement is what characterizes this shot and makes a difference. I think as well that certain Cactus photo retouching less the better. Are no longer true. Until next time! Per me è una foto perfetta. Il movimento è proprio quello che caratterizza questo scatto e fa la differenza. La penso come Cactus anche sul fatto che certe foto meno le ritocchi meglio è. Sono più vere. Alla prossima! |
| sent on June 14, 2012 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Beautiful Fabio! Also I really like the movement of the bird that makes the particular picture or rather different from the usual super-mega-over sharp .... obviously a very personal opinion.
Bella Fabio ! Anche a me piace molto il movimento del pennuto che rende la foto particolare o per meglio dire diversa dalle solite super-mega-over nitide....ovviamente parere del tutto personale.
|
| sent on June 15, 2012 (9:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Nik and Thois, in fact sometimes the photos are not super sharp but I think the "photo" that should say something, even if it is less clear or even grainy. There are pictures of Roiter or even Addams that are not absolutely clear, indeed, but they are spectacular photos. When there was no digital does not place too much emphasis on sharpness, but it gave more importance to the PHOTO itself the composition and the feelings it aroused .. I miss a bit 'these days and sometimes I get depressed a lot lately to publish photos that are judged only because they are SHARP instead of being told, the composition sucks or I would have moved the subject more to the left or right, & c. that's all.
Thanks anyway to all
F @ Grazie Nik e Thois, in effetti a volte le foto non sono ultra nitide ma credo sia la "foto" che deve dire qualcosa, anche se fosse meno nitida o ancora granulosa. Ci sono foto di Roiter o anche di Addams che non sono assolutamente nitide, anzi, ma sono foto spettacolari. Quando non c'era il digitale non si dava troppa importanza alla nitidezza, ma si dava più importanza alla FOTO in se alla composizione ed ai sentimenti che suscitava.. a me mancano un po' quei giorni a volte e ultimamente mi deprimo molto a pubblicare foto che vengono giudicate solo perchè non sono NITIDE invece di sentirmi dire, la compo fa schifo o avrei spostato il soggetto più a sx o a dx, ec. tutto qua.
Grazie comunque a tutti
F@ |
| sent on August 23, 2012 (9:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I like the moment caught hello Angelo mi piace l'attimo colto ciao Angelo |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.9 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
