Untitled Photo | JuzaPhoto

JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Galleries
Underwater Photo

17.9 MEGAPIXEL

Resize to fit window

Acquario di Genova View gallery (6 photos)

Untitled Photo sent on January 20, 2016 (19:09) by Yukino91. 8 comments, 532 views.

at 18mm, 1/500 f/4.5, ISO 640, hand held.

View High Resolution 17.9 MP

4 persons like it: Dantes, Franco Buffalmano, Massibi, Salva693

What do you think about this photo?

Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?

You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 255000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

Fotografatore

sent on January 20, 2016 (19:14)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

bella foto, peccato il riflesso della lampada sull'occhio dell'animale.

Pier

nice picture, shame the reflection of light on the eye of the animal.

Pier

Yukino91

sent on January 20, 2016 (19:21)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

già, davvero peccato...ho tante foto all'interno dell'acquario rovinate dai riflessi...sai come poterlo evitare?

already, really unfortunate ... I have so many pictures inside the aquarium ruined by reflections ... you know how to avoid?

Elleemme

sent on January 20, 2016 (22:33)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Trovo piacevoli il taglio, i colori, l'intereazione-triangolazione .
Per minimizzare i rifessi a volte basta essere paralleli al vetro (qui eri con la digitale basculata leggermente a dx) e usare il paraluce (per contrastare le luci parassite) ... ma a volte non basta Confuso

.
Consiglio di clonare i riflessi sul delfino, radrizzare l'inquadratura( 0.5° a dx), clonare la corda e il supporto a dx, ritagliare la parte superiore.
Ti posto un esempio veloce che posso togliere in un attimo se lo vorrai ;-)

.
Ciao, Lauro

b)

I find nice cut, the colors, the intereazione-triangulation.
To minimize rifessi sometimes just be parallel to the glass (where you were with the digital basculata slightly to the right) and use the hood (to counter the stray light) ... but sometimes not enough: fconfuso :.
Council to clone the reflections on the dolphin, to right the shot (0.5 ° to the right), to clone the rope and the support on the right, cut the top.
I place a quick example that I can take in a moment if you like ;-).
Hello, Lauro

b)

Yukino91

sent on January 20, 2016 (23:33)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

L'idea di foto iniziale era proprio come l'hai postata tu... avrei voluto anche io modificare la foto ma non so come si faccia, hai usato photoshop?
Se riesci mi taglieresti anche il bordo in alto e in basso così da vedere solo l'acqua? :-P

Se la modifichi perdi di dettagli e qualità?
Grazie mille dei consigli

The initial idea was just like the pictures you posted you ... I wanted to change the picture, but I also do not know how to do, did you use photoshop?
If you can I taglieresti also edge up and down so you can see only water? :-P
If you lose the change of details and quality?
Thank you so much advice

Elleemme

sent on January 21, 2016 (14:03)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Se il ritaglio è più sviluppato in un senso che nell'altro la perdita di resa è accettabile ( in gergo: ritaglio compositivo), se il ritaglio è proporzionale per ogni lato dipende sempre dalal percentuale di crop.
Vedo guida inerente: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?f=25&t=18713

Composizioni alternative ? Eccole Sorriso

Ora però viene il bello perchè in totale avrai 4 interpretazioni .
Quale, secondo te, è più funzionale?
a) Nella prima vi sono delle distrazioni che possono essere minimizzate nella post-produzione o con clonature e/o ritagli
b) Nella seconda il taglio mantiene una cornice sopra-sotto che contestualizza la scena
c) 3a : Si è ritagliato solo la parte aerea mantenendo però integri la mamma e il piccolo
d) 4a: Si è tagliato anche la parte inferiore come da tua indicazione ma segando le gambe dei 2 visitatori incantati

Per l'elaborazione immagini o ti affidi a programmi gratuiti tipo Picasa www.google.com/intl/it/picasa/

oppure a programmi a pag.to come Adobe PhotoshopElements 14 che trovo leggero, intuitivo e alternativo a P.S:
Qui puoi scaricarti la versione in italiano di prova www.adobe.com/it/downloads.html
poi puoi decidere di acquistare la licenza
Un domani , su questa piattaforma potresti agganciare una serie di plug molto utili : Nik Suite Collection Google
Qui il topic inerente: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=446295&show=2

If clipping is more developed in one way or another the yield loss is acceptable (in the jargon: crop composition), if the path is proportional to each side depends always Dalal percentage of crop.
I see inherent guide: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?f=25&t=18713

Compositions alternatives? Here they :-)

c)

But now comes the fun part because inTotal will have 4 interpretations.
What do you think is more functional?
a) In the first there are the distractions that can be minimized in post-production or with clonature and / or clippings
b) In the second cutting it maintains an up-down frame that contextualizes the scene
c) 3rd: It is cut out only the part above ground while keeping intact the mother and the baby
d) 4th: He cut the lower part of your display but as sawing the legs of 2 visitors spellbound

For processing images either stick with free programs like Picasa www.google.com/intl/it/picasa/

or programs like Adobe pag.to PhotoshopElements 14 I find light, intuithe additive and alternative to PS:
Here you can get the version in Italian test www.adobe.com/it/downloads.html
then you can choose to license
In the future, this platform could hook a number of very useful plug: Nik Suite Collection Google
Here the topic concerning: www.juzaphoto.com/topic2.php?l=it&t=446295&show=2

Yukino91

sent on January 23, 2016 (9:53)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ti devo ringraziare perché sei stato veramente gentile... Guarderò i link che mi hai mandato e sicuramente scaricheró la versione di prova se c'è...tornando all'immagine, io preferisco la c, quella perfezionata ma senza le gambe tagliate..tu per modificare questa foto quale programma ai usato??Picasa o photoshop?

I must thank you because you've been very kind ... I'll watch the links you sent me and definitely will download the trial version if there is ... back to the image, I prefer c, that finalized but without the legs cut off. .you to change this image which program to use ?? Picasa or Photoshop?

Elleemme

sent on January 23, 2016 (10:09)

This comment is too long to be automatically translated, so it will be shown in its original language (Italian)

Click here to translate the comment in English

Ho usato PSElements Cool

Io preferisco più B) che C)

I used PSElements 8-)
I prefer more B) C)

Salva693

sent on May 05, 2016 (21:44) | This comment has been translated

Very nice!

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.