RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Paesaggio con elementi umani
  4. » Downtown Manhattan fiery - 2

 
Downtown Manhattan fiery - 2...

Capodanno a New York 2015

View gallery (14 photos)

Downtown Manhattan fiery - 2 sent on January 17, 2016 (11:06) by Micheleguerz. 14 comments, 902 views. [retina]

, Posa B f/11.0, ISO 100, tripod. New York, United States.

Ripropongo lo scatto precedente che non ho voluto togliere visto i commenti molto utili ricevuti sotto di esso. Ho seguito i consigli che mi sono stati dati e come prima cosa ho rifilato le rocce in primo piano dando un taglio panoramico 16:9. Poi con Dfine ho eliminato gran parte del rumore agendo localmente ad esclusione dei palazzi. Sono molto soddisfatto del risultato ottenuto con la riduzione del rumore, soprattutto per la leggerissima perdita di dettaglio! Poi personalmente preferisco che non ci siano le rocce in primo piano, ma in questo caso mi sembra che la foto abbia poco respiro da sotto. Che ne pensate? Critiche e consigli sempre bene accetti!



View High Resolution 15.1 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 198000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsupporter
sent on January 17, 2016 (12:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The noise management is certainly improved a lot and removing rocks have deleted a nuisance, if you want more space in the lower leaves wider than the cut and then clone parts of the rock entering, should not be difficult in that area, to me would not mind a 3.2 with the row of poles exactly in the middle and trimming leftmost right sove still would exclude the last trees on which the optics do not seem to have given the best, perhaps potrest rovare also to raise a little medium and dark tones give a little 'of sharpening broad (or even better structure Viveza if you have one) to the area of ??the buildings, all the while with a light hand.
Hello :-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 17, 2016 (13:12) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thank you very much Catherine! I will treasure what I have said and I will especially so many tests! Thanks again ;-)

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2016 (16:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Not bad!!! It has another breath now !! 8-) 8-)

Hello!!

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2016 (16:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Nice shot!
Hello

Luca

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2016 (17:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

very very nice!

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2016 (22:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

bravo and thank you for your comment catterina that surely I profitero myself and me tie two or three times ... for safety ... and looking at the pictures ... hello peter :-P

avatarsenior
sent on January 18, 2016 (23:30) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hi Michele
First of all congratulations to the scene that you were able to take you home, really exceptional.
I also read all the comments on the other and I must say that you have been able to take advantage of the advice they gave you, you have assessed, you put back into play and you've got an image definitely improved, fascinating colors and very good for the special atmosphere the time colto.Questo means using the forum and the comment area as you should.
there are people who even today is discussing the validity of the comments, as usual, complaining about the lack of attention it receives, or on the usual vows of exchange between amici.Se instead of wasting time discussing it were also to review their photos everything would be much easier for everyone.
Your spirit and your willingness youhonors continues.

about this release, however, at this point I would say mine too, so that further complicate matters. ;-)

I swear it's half an hour clipping this picture, I've tried all sorts, and I finally got to my conclusione.premetto that in all fairness the stakes in the middle of the frame does not make me mad, because instead of me navigate I go to Manhattan collided, then I would have preferred a shot more decentralized with the poles on one side and Manhattan on the other, but I do not know if physically possibile.trovo all very central and with some elements that I think even if defiladed encumbers the image.
I see the curve of the posts that turn to the right, so for me the skyscrapersThey should be more decentralized towards dx.Cercherei to remove items that are too much like the antenna on the right (I think it is an antenna) that has nothing to do with the skyscrapers and the shed on the left which implies a building at that point but that ends in nothing.
In practice I would do what you said Catherine in two lines: - | : - | : - | one trick però.il cut 3/2 but not 16/10 to reduce the portion of the sky and bring up the skyline to give him a bit of upward thrust that has been lost to remove the stones below.
excuse for the slowness but to try to ignore me I try to pick exhaustion -D
As usual all according to my personal taste you see if you can come in handy.
Hello
Simone
//postimage.org/]


//postimage.org/index.php? Lang = italian] upload pictures

avatarsenior
sent on January 19, 2016 (0:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

advice of the cuts in part you have indicated giustissimi find the post and shooting very good !! Bravo!

avatarsenior
sent on January 21, 2016 (11:26) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello everyone!
First of all so sorry if I answer right now but with exams these days I was a bit 'busy, but I finally passed "unharmed" winter session: -D

Going back to photography:

Many thanks to everyone for stopping by just to see my photo, really!

@ Simon
I agree with you that the stakes in the middle of the image, when seen in PC, I were difficult to "digest" and I was stuck there too, with his eyes. While I took but I thought it could be a factor driving real skyscrapers.
I like your cut, the photos I find it less heavy but just looking at your cutting I realized thatmaybe if I took with the camera higher and pointing down, I would have completely removed the "wall" of the posts but left their effect driving, right?

cutting 3/2 but not 16/10 to reduce the portion of the sky and bring up the skyline to give him a bit of upward thrust that has been lost to remove the stones sott


Here's what I felt was missing, the "upward momentum"! Thank you very much, if it were not for you to bacchettarmi with the pipe that I'd understand / I would see these things: -D

Finally talking about the antenna and the building right: given that the antenna could easily clone, ACCORDING TO ME, the only ways to remove the building or on the right areits cloning (but I would make a mess) or tighten the frame. With this action, however, I think the picture would not have had this "breath" given by 10mm. Then I do not know in practice! Surely'll seize it clicks later and I will consider your advice!

Thank you again so much Lawrence, Luke, Heather, Peter, Simon and Gianluca! Dear! ;-)

Ps

This is an overview to get you to understand about (Simon) from where I took, as you said
shot more decentralized with the poles on one side and Manhattan on the other, but I do not know if physically possible
.
I do not think it is physically possibile because right is the park that covers the city, and left an industrial shed with that which is seen.







avatarsupporter
sent on April 23, 2016 (17:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful shot, hello, Loris.

avatarsenior
sent on April 23, 2016 (18:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Loris hello, thank you!

avatarsenior
sent on August 01, 2016 (14:43) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Colors and atmosphere stratospheric

avatarsupporter
sent on August 01, 2016 (14:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

A really beautiful shot !! :)

avatarsenior
sent on August 01, 2016 (17:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Marcello and Eric, thank you so much for the changeover and the appreciation!
A greeting ;-)



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me