What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on May 13, 2016 (19:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I looked at the pictures .... this one, for example. : F / 29 is exaggerated ... at most f13! Especially since 1/25 have space to optimize the picture .... Just 1/60!
or 1/125 .... here: it wants to balance ....
Sorry to confusion ......
A greeting
PS I come from a stroke ... So if a message is incorrect, please excuse me.
Ho guardato le foto....questa qui,ad es. : f/29 è esagerata...al massimo f13! Tanto più che 1/25 hai spazio per ottimizzare la foto....Basta 1/60 !
oppure 1/125.... ecco:ci vuole equilibrio....
Scusa per averti confusione......
un saluto
P.S. Vengo da un ictus...Quindi, se un messaggio è non corretto,vogliate scusarmi.
|
| sent on May 15, 2016 (8:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
do not worry
you explained very well
thanks all counsel and always welcome
:-)
david non ti preoccupare
ti sei spiegato benissimo
grazie ogni consiglio e sempre gradito
davide |
| sent on May 15, 2016 (12:10) | This comment has been translated
 |
user59947 | sent on May 17, 2016 (21:37) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
eh here I agree with David Maurice,
I'm sorry if I may, I see that a lot of clicks to the safety time, as he told you if Maurizio shots as in this shot in 56 mm, at a minimum you should use a 1/84 time or more, and then f / 29 do not need anything. I advise you to read and study some of the safety rules snap. you do the math on that full frame the safety time and equal to 1. For example if you take a 56 mm as in this photo should be the minimum time to 1/56 but if in your case the 56 mm has to be multiplied by 1.5, then 56x1.5 = 84
this only applies to stationary objects and not for things in motion, I hope Essert been helpful. If you need something ask purging all of the answers you darranò
Hello
ardian
eh anche qui Davide concordo con Maurizio,
scusami se mi posso permettermi, vedo che scatti molto al di la del tempo di sicurezza, come ti ha detto Maurizio se scatti come in questo scatto a 56 mm, come minimo dovresti usare un tempo 1/84 o più, e poi un f/29 non ti serve niente. ti consiglio di leggere e di studiare un po le regole dello scatto di sicurezza. fai i conti che su full frame il tempo di sicurezza e pari a 1. per esempio se scatti a 56 mm come in questa foto il tempo minimo deve essere a 1/56 se invece nel tuo caso il 56 mm deve essere moltiplicato per 1.5, quindi 56x1.5=84
questo vale solo per gli oggetti fermi e non per cose in movimento, spero di esserti stato utile. se hai bisogno di qualcosa chiedi puri tutti ti darranò delle risposte
ciao
ardian
|
| sent on May 18, 2016 (7:42) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but I've come and d instinct, as with a compact
with valuable advice
david ;-) gia ma mi e venuta d istinto, come con una compatta
grazie dei preziosi consigli
davide |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
12.2 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
