What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 07, 2012 (17:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Sum of 17 exposures of 4 minutes flat 21 21 800 iso 7dark bias telescope Celestron Onyx 80mm nikon d90! Somma di 17 pose da 4 minuti 800 iso 7dark 21 flat 21 bias telescopio 80mm onyx celestron nikon d90!! |
| sent on June 07, 2012 (18:01)
Molto affascinante! |
| sent on June 07, 2012 (18:13) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thank you very much Juza, if I had goals that I have in mind would very faville.Purtroppo I have to settle with what I have, then I would think the 14-24 f2.8 nikkor for photographing the beautiful Milky Way! Grazie mille Juza,se avessi gli obiettivi che ho in mente farei molto faville.Purtroppo mi devo accontentare con quello che ho,poi avrei in mente il 14-24 f2.8 nikkor per fotografare la meravigliosa via lattea!! |
| sent on June 07, 2012 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
We assume that you have been good and the shot is beautiful ..
However I think the yield on the edge of Celestron (refractor?) Is not the best and the picture improved in post production.
Anyway still sincere compliments :) Partiamo dal presupposto che sei stato bravo e lo scatto è bellissimo..
Tuttavia penso che la resa ai bordi del celestron (rifrattore?) non sia il massimo e la foto migliorabile in post produzione.
Cmq ancora complimenti sinceri :) |
| sent on June 07, 2012 (19:01) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Maybe Julian! Improve the picture we should take a field flattener that costs more than the telescope but I will present your advice! Thank you very much! Magari Giuliano!per migliorare la foto ci vorrebbe uno spianatore di campo che costa più del telescopio ma terrò presente i tuoi consigli!!grazie mille!! |
| sent on June 08, 2012 (19:14) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree with Julian, both the yield on the edges (but if the remote is that you can not do anything except change the canvas!) And post-production: although the Pleiades and their nebulae are blue, I think there is a bit ' imbalance in the blue / green. In the Pleiades there are also many stars red and orange, but here you can see all the same color. I would try to balance it better. A fussiness: something has gone wrong in the flat because you see a little 'vignetting (indeed, vignetting, on the contrary, the edges seem clear).
For the rest I join the compliementi, despite the need to un'aggiustina you have collected a lot 'of signal!
hello
Clear
Concordo con Giuliano, sia per la resa ai bordi (ma se il tele è quello tu non puoi farci niente a parte cambiare il tele!) e la postproduzione: benchè le Pleiadi e le relative nebulose siano blu, mi sembra ci sia un po' di sbilanciamento verso il blu/verde. Nelle Pleiadi ci sono anche molte stelle rosse e arancioni, ma qui si vedono tutte dello stesso colore. Proverei a bilanciarla meglio. Una pignoleria: qualcosa non ha funzionato nei flat perchè si vede un po' di vignettatura (anzi, vignettatura al contrario, i bordi mi sembrano chiari).
Per il resto mi unisco ai compliementi, nonostante la necessità di un'aggiustina hai raccolto un bel po' di segnale!
ciao
Chiara
|
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
3.0 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
