JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 252000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
sent on June 05, 2012 (21:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Gabry do not know how you handled the flash, but I think here the spouses are too small and too put in context. In this way the flash away 'cause otherwise would have entered in the first step.
I do not know if there was something a little 'more' free but I would put the couple in the foreground with the sun behind or otherwise than from behind them, this measure would increase the separation from the background. At this point I used a single flash to lighten the shadows positioned in opposition to the sun. It 'a pattern that creates detachment and contrast. If you also want soft shadows on the couple can place two fill-in flash with different powers. On one side of the master and on the opposite side a flash hitting the subject with 2/3 stop less. You'll shadows dates from the first flash but the second will be softened. Gabry non so come hai gestito i flash, ma secondo me qui gli sposi sono troppo piccoli e troppo inseriti nel contesto. In questo modo i flash sono lontani perche' altrimenti sarebbero entrati nello scatto.
Non so se c'era un posto un po' piu' libero ma avrei messo gli sposi in primissimo piano con la luce del sole alle spalle o comunque da dietro rispetto a loro, questo accorgimento avrebbe aumentato lo stacco dallo sfondo. A questo punto avrei usato un solo flash per schiarire le ombre posizionato in opposizione rispetto al sole. E' uno schema che crea stacco e contrasto. Se vuoi anche ombre morbide sugli sposi puoi posizionare 2 flash di schiarita con potenze diverse. Su un lato il flash principale e sul lato opposto un flash che colpisce il soggetto con 2/3 di stop in meno. Avrai delle ombre date dal primo flash ma saranno ammorbidite dal secondo.
sent on June 05, 2012 (22:03) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Thanks Gian Luca, one to the left slightly to illuminate the groom and one right behind the olive tree for the bride, the ground you notice a slight bleached. I made this because I liked the idea of ??depth and I wanted were not too dimensioned with respect to the vanishing point on the left. Gazie yet, I'll try the pattern you suggested! Grazie Gian Luca, uno a sinistra ad illuminare leggermente lo sposo ed uno a destra dietro l'ulivo per la sposa, in terra si nota una leggera sbiancata. L'ho composta così perchè mi piaceva l'idea di profondità e volevo che non fossero troppo dimensionati rispetto al punto di fuga a sinistra. Gazie ancora, proverò lo schema che mi hai suggerito!
sent on October 07, 2012 (9:22) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Quoto sailor with regard to the management of the lights, I like it, however the photo as you have made, I do not like the pose of the couple. Quoto marinaio per quanto riguarda la gestione delle luci, mi piace, invece la foto così come l'hai composta, non mi piace la posa degli sposi.