What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
user81257 | sent on December 18, 2015 (17:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
This picture is not bad but I would have been better if I had not put the house in the center of the picture and if I reduced the noise (I think he worked too much of post-production).
You shot at ISO 640 with a time of 1/2500, useless for a landscape like that, it wanted only a simple 1/400. In this case you could shoot at ISO 100, eliminating a lot of noise.
Question: did you take automatically true?
MC. Questa foto non è male ma secondo me sarebbe stata migliore se avessi messo la casa non al centro della foto e se avessi ridotto il rumore (penso che abbia lavorato troppo di post-produzione).
Hai scattato a 640 iso con un tempo di 1/2500, inutile per un paesaggio del genere, sarebbe bastato un semplicissimo 1/400. In questo caso avresti potuto scattare ad iso 100 eliminando molto rumore.
Domanda: hai scattato in automatico vero?
MC. |
| sent on December 18, 2015 (18:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
no shooting ever in manual or priority. it is simply photos I had to make in a hurry because the light was very unusual at that time and I could not do better. I am a beginner. however, the noise is generated by the machine. no scatto sempre in manuale o priorità. si tratta semplicemente di foto che ho dovuto realizzare in fretta in quanto la luce era molto particolare in quel preciso momento e non sono riuscito a fare di meglio. sono un principiante. comunque il rumore è quello generato dalla macchina. |
user81257 | sent on December 18, 2015 (18:45) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Okay, then you do something (or so I work): the ISO always keep them to 100, default mean. When they get up, eventually return them to 100 so that if you have to shoot on the fly, you've already idle, in case you forget to look at them.
Or, if you have to take under certain conditions (indoors or constant light), septal little as possible to the scene and let them fixed.
The rest of the changes during shooting.
MC. Ok, allora fai una cosa (almeno così lavoro io): gli iso tienili sempre a 100, di default intendo. Quando li alzi, alla fine riportali a 100 in modo che se devi scattare al volo, li hai già al minimo, in caso ti dimenticassi di guardarli.
Oppure, se devi scattare in determinate condizioni (luogo chiuso o illuminazione costante), settali il meno possibile per quella scena e lasciali li fissi.
Il resto lo cambi in fase di scatto.
MC. |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
16.1 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
