What do you think about this photo?Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?
You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
| sent on June 01, 2012 (20:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
but it 's a superposition of two shots? ma e' una sovrapposizione di due scatti? |
| sent on June 01, 2012 (22:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Yes, almost.
Actually when I saw the plane pointing above me I hoped to compose the shot directly, but the final trajectory was left moved to the left of the moon so I "approached" later in Photoshop. Not by much, and the focal length is the same (I used the same frame) but it is not exactly how I saw in the viewfinder. :-) Sì, quasi.
In realtà quando ho visto l'aereo che puntava sopra di me ho sperato di riuscire a comporre lo scatto direttamente, ma la traiettoria finale restava più spostata a sinistra rispetto alla luna quindi l'ho "avvicinata" successivamente in Photoshop. Non di molto e la focale è la stessa (ho usato lo stesso fotogramma) ma non è esattamente come l'ho vista nel mirino.  |
| sent on June 02, 2012 (8:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Not bad and in fact it would be more in line with the title ;-) but it seems unnatural ... I do not know, maybe because I know what I saw and my composition does not disrupts the geometry.
Thanks anyway :-) Non male e in effetti sarebbe più in linea col titolo  ma mi sembra innaturale... non so, forse perché so cosa ho visto e la mia composizione non ne stravolge la geometria.
Grazie comunque |
| sent on June 02, 2012 (9:06) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
you know how many photos "famous" are actually completely rebuilt? certain is the photographer who knows what he saw, but I think it's more important offrrire observer and not a meaningful bound.
the rest of the picture is a collection of many variations and also the only change its color makes a product "unnatural."
so do not worry about what you see but what you offer. :-D
hello good light
sai quante foto "famose" in realtà sono completamente ricostruite? certo è il fotografo che sa quello che ha visto ma credo sia più importante offrrire all'osservatore un'immagine significativa e non vincolata.
del resto la fotografia è un insieme di molteplici variazioni e anche il solo variarne la tonalità ne fa un prodotto "innaturale".
quindi non ti preoccupare di quello che vedi ma di quello che offri.
buona luce ciao
|
| sent on June 02, 2012 (10:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I agree and in fact as you can see I have nothing against the postprocessing ... the problem is the boundary between photography and processing pure.
Personal question. Do you think that this is the only picture I have "broken down" into its elements. I never do, normally I just cut the picture and clean it by some element of disorder with cloning tools.
Good light also you, hello :-) Son d'accordo e infatti come vedi non ho nulla contro il postprocessing... il problema è il limite tra la fotografia e l'elaborazione pura.
Questione personalissima. Pensa che questa è l'unica immagine che ho "scomposto" nei suoi elementi. Non lo faccio mai, normalmente mi limito a tagliare l'inquadratura e a pulirla da qualche elemento di disturbo con i cloning tools.
Buona luce anche te, ciao |
| sent on June 02, 2012 (13:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Like all things you should not overdo it ... then only if the person who says what he did makes about regardless of whether it is legitimate or not ... photographic tricks have always done well with the analog and will continue to do, ' ''' I think the important thing is to have ideas and things to say ... Hello everyone! Come tutte le cose non bisognerebbe solo esagerare...poi se chi dichiara cosa ha fatto gli rende merito a prescindere se è legittimo o no...i trucchi fotografici si sono sempre fatti anche con l'analogico e si continueranno a fare, ''secondo me '' l'importante è avere idee e cose da raccontare...ciao a tutti! |
| sent on June 02, 2012 (20:04) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Azz! :-) Azz!!  |
| sent on June 07, 2012 (13:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
Very beautiful and original!! Molto bella e originale !!!!!! |
| sent on October 15, 2013 (17:57) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
I love this kind of minimalism ... Adoro questo genere di minimalismo... |
| sent on October 15, 2013 (18:20) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
thou hast her xche '
congratulations
luca c'hai il suo xche'
complimenti
luca |
| sent on December 10, 2015 (12:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)
See Under snap superb! Vedi alla voce scatto superbo! |
|
Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info) |
![[retina]](shared_files/layout/retina_badge.jpg){kind=icon}
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
10.4 MEGAPIXEL
Resize to fit window
